Skip to content

Clarify doc links#112

Merged
leynos merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/update-module-doc-comment-in-runner.rs
Aug 13, 2025
Merged

Clarify doc links#112
leynos merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/update-module-doc-comment-in-runner.rs

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Aug 12, 2025

Summary

  • prevent dead intra-doc links in runner by referring to main literally
  • avoid broken link in CLI help text

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint
  • make test
  • RUSTDOCFLAGS="-D warnings" cargo doc --no-deps

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_689a9ae5485c83228b56687602156418

Summary by Sourcery

Clarify documentation links to prevent dead intra-doc references and broken help text

Documentation:

  • Replace intra-doc link to main in runner module with literal code reference to avoid dead links
  • Update CLI help text for Build command to use literal default instead of markdown-style [default]

Replace bracketed placeholders with literal text to avoid broken intra-doc links.
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Updated documentation references and CLI help text formatting to prevent broken intra-doc links and ensure correct display of default flags.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Refined CLI help description formatting for default targets
  • Replaced bracket notation [default] with inline code span default in the build command help text
  • Ensured the help message displays the word default correctly without generating dead links
src/cli.rs
Replaced dead intra-doc link to main with literal code span
  • Changed doc comment from linking to [main] to using inline code main
  • Removed link syntax to avoid warnings and broken references in generated docs
src/runner.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved CLI help text formatting for the build command, using clearer inline code styling and updated phrasing for the default behaviour.
    • Refined documentation references to the main entry point for consistency and readability.
    • No functional changes: commands, flags, and outputs remain unchanged.

Walkthrough

Summarise documentation-only edits: update doc comments in src/cli.rs and src/runner.rs to use inline-code formatting; make no code, API, or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs formatting
src/cli.rs, src/runner.rs
Replace bracketed link-style references with inline-code formatting in doc comments (e.g., default indicator and main reference). No code, API, or control-flow changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Tweak the words, leave gears unchanged,
Backticks shine where links were arranged.
The build still builds, the run still runs,
Only the docs don sharper suns.
A tiny brush, a tidy glow—
Ship it neat, let clarity show.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01c2ac6 and ee1290c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/cli.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/runner.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Where code is only used by specific features, it must be conditionally compiled or a conditional expectation for unused_code applied.

  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • src/cli.rs
  • src/runner.rs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/runner.rs (1)

3-5: Resolve dead intra-doc link by using inline code — LGTM

Use of inline code for main prevents rustdoc dead links. No behaviour change; aligns with the PR objective.

src/cli.rs (1)

97-99: Render “default” literally in help text — LGTM

Backticks avoid markdown-style link rendering in clap help output. Matches the PR goal; no API impact.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/update-module-doc-comment-in-runner.rs

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 files reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

leynos commented Aug 12, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

leynos commented Aug 13, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@leynos leynos merged commit 8b690d9 into main Aug 13, 2025
4 checks passed
@leynos leynos deleted the codex/update-module-doc-comment-in-runner.rs branch August 13, 2025 00:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant