Update connection actor status note

[leynos]

Summary

• add a single Implementation Status section
• remove repeated wording about the missing connection actor

Testing

• make fmt
• make lint
• make test
• markdownlint docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md
• nixie docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md
• mdformat-all docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md (fails: table column count errors in unrelated files)

---

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_685a9c787bec8322be49b4eaf12bb31c

Summary by Sourcery

Streamline the asynchronous outbound messaging design document by consolidating the implementation status section and refining markdown formatting for clarity.

Documentation:

• Consolidate the connection actor implementation note into a single 'Implementation Status' section and remove redundant wording
• Update the requirements table delimiter formatting for consistent markdown styling
• Adjust paragraph line wrapping for improved readability

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Clarified the current implementation status with a dedicated "Implementation Status" section.
  • Improved formatting and readability of the design goals table.
  • Standardised line breaks for consistency in Section 7.1.
  • No changes to functionality or API descriptions.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Consolidate the missing connection actor note into a dedicated "Implementation Status" section, refine redundant wording, correct the Markdown table header formatting, and adjust line wrapping in the sequence-ids note.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Introduce a dedicated Implementation Status section and consolidate actor status note	Added '### Implementation Status' heading Rewrote section to describe existing queue utilities and pending actor implementation Removed repeated wording about missing connection actor	docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md
Update Markdown table header formatting	Removed leading dash before table header row Adjusted header separator syntax with consistent dashes Aligned columns for readability	docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md
Adjust line wrapping for sequence-ids reset description	Split long line into two for protocol integrity note Ensured consistent indentation	docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The documentation for asynchronous outbound messaging was updated to clarify the current implementation status and improve formatting consistency. No changes were made to the underlying design, logic, or API descriptions; the updates are limited to restructuring and rewording the documentation for clarity and readability.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md	Clarified implementation status, improved formatting of tables and paragraphs, and enhanced consistency in documentation. No functional or logical changes made.

Possibly related PRs

• Document server-initiated packet design #122: Also clarifies and expands the asynchronous outbound messaging documentation, focusing on the connection actor model and server-initiated packet design.
• Fix asynchronous push docs diagrams #119: Modifies diagrams and method signatures in the same documentation, addressing generics and flow, which complements the present documentation improvements.

Suggested reviewers

• codescene-delta-analysis

Poem

In docs we hop with nimble care,
Aligning tables, words laid bare.
Status clear, with headers neat,
Formatting makes the read a treat.
No code was changed, just what you see—
A rabbit’s touch on clarity!
🐇📚

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate Unit Tests

• Create PR with Unit Tests
• Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
• Commit Unit Tests in branch codex/consolidate-missing-connection-actor-notes

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9db5368 and e69ed52.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md (2 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: build-test

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/asynchronous-outbound-messaging-design.md (1)

41-47: Table header spacing still fails mdformat strictness

mdformat-all previously failed on unrelated tables, but this table has the same root cause: the leading/trailing pipes are required for mdformat’s “strict” table style.

-| ID  | Requirement                                                                                                                                            |
-| --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| ID  | Requirement                                                                                                                                             |
+| --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

Failing to fix it will continue to trip future automated formatters/lints when someone runs them at repo root.