Skip to content

Add time slice fairness test#181

Closed
leynos wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
ty7nul-codex/add-test-for-fairness-with-time_slice-yielding
Closed

Add time slice fairness test#181
leynos wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
ty7nul-codex/add-test-for-fairness-with-time_slice-yielding

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Jul 5, 2025

Summary

  • add test to cover time-based queue fairness when max_high_before_low is zero
  • clean up duplicate imports in test module

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint
  • make test
  • cargo test fairness_yields_low_with_time_slice -- --nocapture

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68684cd037548322a494feb0d1e8476d

Summary by Sourcery

Add a test to verify time-based queue fairness with a nonzero time slice when high-priority quotas are zero and remove redundant imports from the test module

Tests:

  • Introduce fairness_yields_low_with_time_slice to ensure low-priority items are yielded based on time slices when max_high_before_low is zero

Chores:

  • Clean up duplicate imports in the connection actor test module

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Jul 5, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Introduces a new time-slice–based fairness test for the connection actor and tidies up duplicate imports in the test module.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Add time-slice fairness test to verify low-priority items are yielded when max_high_before_low is zero
  • Configured FairnessConfig with max_high_before_low=0 and a 10ms time_slice
  • Spawned ConnectionActor in a tokio task and captured its output via a oneshot channel
  • Interleaved high- and low-priority pushes with sleeps to trigger time-based switching
  • Added assertions to ensure the low-priority item appears in the middle of the output
tests/connection_actor.rs
Remove duplicate imports in the test module
  • Eliminated redundant or repeated use statements
  • Consolidated imports for clarity
tests/connection_actor.rs

Possibly linked issues

  • #-1: The PR adds the test described in the issue for time-based fairness when max_high_before_low is zero.

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Added new tests to verify fairness behaviour for processing high and low priority items under different configurations.
    • Improved timing-dependent test reliability using Tokio's virtual clock utilities.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies to include additional Tokio test utilities.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added two new asynchronous tests in tests/connection_actor.rs to verify different fairness configurations of the ConnectionActor.
    • One test checks that with fairness disabled, all high-priority items are processed before any low-priority items.
    • The other test verifies that with a time slice fairness policy, low-priority items are yielded appropriately among high-priority items.
    • Updated import statements to include tokio::sync::oneshot.

Walkthrough

Two new asynchronous test functions were added to tests/connection_actor.rs verifying the ConnectionActor fairness behaviour under different configurations: one with fairness disabled ensuring all high-priority items are processed first, and another with a time slice fairness policy ensuring low-priority items are yielded appropriately. Import statements were updated accordingly.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/connection_actor.rs Added async tests for fairness disabled and time slice fairness; updated imports to include tokio::sync::oneshot.
Cargo.toml Added "test-util" feature to tokio dependency features list.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test
    participant ConnectionActor
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Spawn with fairness config (max_high_before_low=0, no time slice)
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Push high-priority items
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Push low-priority items
    ConnectionActor-->>Test: Output sequence (all high before any low)

    Note over Test,ConnectionActor: Second test with time slice fairness

    Test->>ConnectionActor: Spawn with fairness config (max_high_before_low=0, time_slice=10ms)
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Push initial high-priority items
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Wait (delay)
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Push more high-priority items
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Push low-priority item
    Test->>ConnectionActor: Push additional high-priority items
    ConnectionActor-->>Test: Output sequence (low-priority item appears mid-sequence)
Loading

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the warren where fairness is king,
A new test hops in on a time-slice spring.
Highs and lows queue up in a row,
With milliseconds guiding the flow.
The rabbit checks: did fairness win?
Yes—low hops in, right in the middle, with a grin!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in a Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch ty7nul-codex/add-test-for-fairness-with-time_slice-yielding

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe4508f and 22846a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/connection_actor.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.rs`: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, o...

**/*.rs: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, or complexity. Don't echo the obvious.
Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.
Function documentation must include clear examples.
Every module must begin with a module level (//!) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Use predicate functions for conditional criteria with more than two branches.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Fix any warnings emitted during tests in the code itself rather than silencing them.
Where a function is too long, extract meaningfully named helper functions adhering to separation of concerns and CQRS.
Where a function has too many parameters, group related parameters in meaningfully named structs.
Where a function is returning a large error consider using Arc to reduce the amount of data returned.
Write unit and behavioural tests for new functionality. Run both before and after making any change.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Avoid unsafe code unless absolutely necessary and document any usage clearly.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • tests/connection_actor.rs
`**/*.rs`: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12...

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments must use en-GB-oxendict spelling and grammar.

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • tests/connection_actor.rs
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/connection_actor.rs (2)
tests/preamble.rs (1)
  • oneshot (73-73)
src/connection.rs (3)
  • shutdown_token (142-142)
  • new (101-108)
  • new (430-439)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/connection_actor.rs (1)

8-11: Import organisation looks correct.

The addition of tokio::sync::oneshot to the import block is properly organised and necessary for the new test function.

Comment thread tests/connection_actor.rs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d316084 and 4bb13bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`Cargo.toml`: Use explicit version ranges in `Cargo.toml` and keep dependencies up-to-date.

Cargo.toml: Use explicit version ranges in Cargo.toml and keep dependencies up-to-date.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • Cargo.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-test
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)

Comment thread Cargo.toml
serde = { version = "1", features = ["derive"] }
bincode = "2"
tokio = { version = "1", default-features = false, features = ["net", "signal", "rt-multi-thread", "macros", "sync", "time", "io-util"] }
tokio = { version = "1", default-features = false, features = ["net", "signal", "rt-multi-thread", "macros", "sync", "time", "io-util", "test-util"] }
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider scoping test-util to test-only builds.

Adding the test-util feature directly to the main tokio dependency means the extra test helpers will be compiled for release builds as well, marginally increasing compile time and binary size.
A cleaner approach is to keep the production feature list lean and add a separate tokio entry under [dev-dependencies] (or expose a crate feature) that includes test-util, e.g.:

-[dependencies]
-tokio = { version = "1", default-features = false, features = ["net", "signal", "rt-multi-thread", "macros", "sync", "time", "io-util", "test-util"] }
+[dependencies]
+tokio = { version = "1", default-features = false, features = ["net", "signal", "rt-multi-thread", "macros", "sync", "time", "io-util"] }
+
+[dev-dependencies]
+# Pulls in the extra helpers only when running `cargo test`
+tokio = { version = "1", default-features = false, features = ["rt-multi-thread", "macros", "sync", "time", "io-util", "test-util"] }

This keeps release artefacts free of test-only code while preserving determinism in your new fairness tests.
(If you decide to leave it as-is, it will still work correctly; this is purely an optimisation suggestion.)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Cargo.toml at line 9, the `test-util` feature of the `tokio` dependency is
included in the main dependency list, causing test utilities to be compiled in
release builds. To fix this, remove `test-util` from the main `tokio` features
and instead add a separate `tokio` entry under `[dev-dependencies]` with the
`test-util` feature included. This change scopes `test-util` to test-only
builds, keeping production builds lean.

@leynos leynos closed this Jul 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant