Skip to content

Conversation

@salmad3
Copy link
Contributor

@salmad3 salmad3 commented Dec 7, 2022

Context

Notes

  • Section this document lives under will become populated with corresponding PRs

Latest preview

Please view the latest Fleek preview here.

@salmad3 salmad3 added the ready for review PR is ready for review label Dec 7, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@marten-seemann marten-seemann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also add a paragraph saying that yamux is the better choice than mplex, similar to what I suggested adding to mplex?

We've had people in the past use mplex instead of yamux, just because they weren't aware of the differences, and it would be nice if we could point them into the right direction.

@salmad3 salmad3 added change request PR requires changes. and removed ready for review PR is ready for review labels Dec 8, 2022
@salmad3 salmad3 added ready for review PR is ready for review and removed change request PR requires changes. labels Dec 12, 2022
@salmad3
Copy link
Contributor Author

salmad3 commented Dec 19, 2022

@marten-seemann can be checked again.

Co-authored-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
salmad3 and others added 2 commits January 24, 2023 06:38
Co-authored-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
@salmad3 salmad3 removed P1 High ready for review PR is ready for review labels Jan 31, 2023
Co-authored-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
@salmad3 salmad3 merged commit 6837d95 into master Jan 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Populate yamux stream muxer doc

3 participants