This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2025. It is now read-only.
Use RUSTDOCFLAGS in CI#78
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Unfortunately, `cargo doc` doesn't use `RUSTFLAGS`, which made our `lsps1`-cfg-gated CI check useless so far. Here, we fix this by using `RUSTDOCFLAGS` instead.
This was referenced Jan 1, 2024
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Unfortunately,
cargo docdoesn't useRUSTFLAGS, which made ourlsps1-cfg-gated CI check useless so far. Here, we fix this by usingRUSTDOCFLAGSinstead.