swap-in-potentiam?

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

Would supporting a swap-in-potentiam onchain receving address be in scope for this?

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

Basically, this would immediately be credited as self-custodial with the LSP, assuming the swap-in-potentiam amount is "big enough". As we expect onchain to be expensive in terms of bytes rather than amount, we expect that most onchain actions will be large amounts that would do well with the "jump to non-custodial immediately".

[benthecarman]

Yes this would be great! I think it'd require a lot of changes on both the lsp and client side to be able to support crediting the balance but would be a big ux win