bug: invoice is not settled, but funds were received over on-chain htlc sweep

[avemeva]

Background

• User has created channel with zigzag.io.
• User has sent lightning network payment using given by us invoice.
• User wrote in support saying that payment was made, but service wasn't given.
• I checked listinvoice command and it showed that invoice wasn't paid.
• User notified that channel in which payment was made was closed.
• I checked closedchannels command and it showed settled balance equal to zero.
• I asked for preimage.
• User presented preimage.
• I have checked logs and it seems that our node has broadcasted second-layer transition tx to swipe htlc, so, payment preimage was revealed on-chain.
• I have checked listchaintxns on a sign of sweep transaction, found it.

I need to give response to user back, because otherwise his funds in "limbo", could you clarify how could I check that I have received funds or not, so that we could provide service to user?

---

channel txid: 9aac89fb96aa52dcb9c59ba9fd428820a90191dc7313c0930efdcae79f7220a2
close channel txid: 3c7e84e6f635c3b708361130a5f526720bd9168a2a53ae994381b6170c11898f
our swipe htlc txid (assumption):  182e18a66e7650bb20a04884ca578d61088be70365122496a111c229a075e659
payment hash: ed9da5d9723621e322cba8160714df055a5fb173796429fc7b36015ef8657142

lncli listchaintxns | grep -C20 bc1q7lujeuy4v0e4dz2c44ak82u6hxgt0upme427dcy3l9zpkdnjqxtquf7tpx
. . . 
        {
            "tx_hash": "182e18a66e7650bb20a04884ca578d61088be70365122496a111c229a075e659",
            "amount": "0",
            "num_confirmations": 871,
            "block_hash": "000000000000000000159ba21971315a393decb320f92511fa0b99833327d63d",
            "block_height": 567239,
            "time_stamp": "1552683907",
            "total_fees": "0",
            "dest_addresses": [
                "bc1q7lujeuy4v0e4dz2c44ak82u6hxgt0upme427dcy3l9zpkdnjqxtquf7tpx"
            ]
        },
. . . 

lncli closedchannels | grep -C20 9aac89fb96aa52dcb9c59ba9fd428820a90191dc7313c0930efdcae79f7220a2

. . . 
        {
            "channel_point": "9aac89fb96aa52dcb9c59ba9fd428820a90191dc7313c0930efdcae79f7220a2:0",
            "chan_id": "623674881183055872",
            "chain_hash": "000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f",
            "closing_tx_hash": "3c7e84e6f635c3b708361130a5f526720bd9168a2a53ae994381b6170c11898f",
            "remote_pubkey": "033155023f4248cc522d488bccabf265a1365760de7420d03c02ffb6d8931328ce",
            "capacity": "2000000",
            "close_height": 567238,
            "settled_balance": "0",
            "time_locked_balance": "0",
            "close_type": "LOCAL_FORCE_CLOSE"
        },
. . . 

Couldn't send logs of broadcast transaction because it contains preimage, and I am not sure it is secure for now.

Your environment

• version of lnd
  0.5.2-beta commit=v0.5.2-beta

• which operating system (uname -a on *Nix)
  Linux b2e97bc142d1 4.4.0-142-generic Various formatting tweaks #168-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 16 21:00:45 UTC 2019 x86_64 Linux

• version of btcd, bitcoind, or other backend
  bitcoind

Expected behaviour

1. Invoice being marked as settled, if htlc is swept on-chain.
2. Probably I am understanding "settled" balance wrong in output of closedchannels command, but it seems as if it should show non-zero settled balance, if htlc was swept.

Actual behaviour

1. Invoice not being marked as settled.
2. closedchannels output shows that channel has zero settled funds.

[cfromknecht]

@AndrewSamokhvalov should have been fixed in #2075, which is in master but not 0.5.2

[Roasbeef]

The HTLC was redeemed on chain, if you restarted during this process, then it isn't marked as settled back. That'll be fixed in #2762. Will re-open if there're more details (on chain I see y'all force closed to pull the pre-image).

[Roasbeef]

The settled balance there is your local balance. But if you only had an incoming HTLC to you, then it isn't accounted there atm.

[avemeva]

Thanks