-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
routerrpc: async payment rpc #2973
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Roasbeef
merged 9 commits into
lightningnetwork:master
from
joostjager:newer-payment-rpc
Jun 5, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
afd8676
lntypes: add ZeroHash
joostjager 19d5f8f
routing: move default cltv assignment out of router
joostjager eb700d3
routerrpc: extend payment request parameters
joostjager 87d3207
channeldb+routing: move control tower interface to routing
joostjager eb2647e
channeldb: add subscription to control tower
joostjager 07d289c
routing: add SendPaymentAsync to router
joostjager f03533c
routerrpc: convert sendpayment to async
joostjager 2644759
channeldb: add todo for more detailed failure reasons
joostjager 220c2be
lncli: unify payinvoice and sendpayment code
joostjager File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To avoid having to do this change, one could instead provinde the route as a param to the
Successmethod in the routingControlTower.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if that is better. It puts a new requirement on the caller of
ControlTower.