Fix Pruned Node Loss Sync Issue.#8428
Conversation
|
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are limited to the following labels: llm-review. Please add one of these labels to enable auto reviews. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the To trigger a single review, invoke the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
Curious why the |
|
So we did not have the block in the cache and it failed to get requested, here is the stack trace from one of those deadlocks I analysed: |
8f147a9 to
83c9c8f
Compare
|
Can be rebased now! |
|
Excited to push this to everyone using BTCPay Server once ready. Thanks for your work everyone! |
|
@rockstardev the dependent PR has been merged. Once this is rebased and passes review+CI, we'll fold it into v0.17.4 rc1. |
|
Perfect, I have a few merchants waiting for this, so will provide them with rc1 once you tag it and I'll ask them to test. |
83c9c8f to
f42e9c4
Compare
yyforyongyu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Need to fix the linter re go mod on subdirs, otherwise it's good to go ⛵
Update the btcwallet version to fix a case where fetching of already pruned blocks from our peers was not garbage collected when the request failed.
f42e9c4 to
141a30d
Compare
Change Description
Fixes for #8250 happened in btcwallet (btcsuite/btcwallet#903), this just bumps the version.