Some minor fixes#92
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR!
As I pointed out in the comments section of the review, the second aspect of the commit has already landed in the latest version of master in an identical form. So if you rebase to the latest master, it should disappear.
One final item to be addressed before I merge this:
-
To match the style of most of the commits within the project, the commit body+header should adhere to the guidelines outlined in the contribution guidelines.
-
A suitable commit header would be something like:
chainntfns: add missing break statements in search for txindex
Or something along those lines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Excellent catch, here my off-by-one senses were tingling when I originally wrote this fragment. Good to see the bug corrected. However, the same error was noticed by @bryanvu and fixed in his latest PR. If you rebase to the latest version of master, the part of the diff should disappear.
|
I recently committed a pretty large change in master catching up some of our First, ensure that you've pulled the latest version of
So then anytime I want to push a new branch to possibly be a PR to the mainline, or modify an existing PR, I'd do:
Then if I needed to catch up my changes to the latest version of master, I'd execute: An interactive rebase will pop up in your default text editor, if you see any lingering commits that are left over from a failed attempt (like the few that are on this branch now), simply deleting those lines will remove them from your rebased branch. After finishing the interactive rebase, you'll then force push to your remote branch: If you need any help with the above process, or have any more questions, we now have the |
14ae2ef to
a8a3375
Compare
Roasbeef
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Everything looks good now, the extra commits have been discarded.
LGTM
Upgrade to LND 0.15.3
Break out of loop once txIndex is found.
Get correct block height for txConfirmation.