itest: fix flake in testAnchorThirdPartySpend#9445
Conversation
When mining lots of blocks in the itest, the subsystems can be out of sync in terms of the best block height. We now assert the num of pending sweeps on Alice's node to give her more time to sync the blocks, essentially behaving like a `time.Sleep` as in reality, the blocks would never be generated this fast.
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Cherry-picked from the sweeper PR.
When mining lots of blocks in the itest, the subsystems can be out of
sync in terms of the best block height. We now assert the num of pending
sweeps on Alice's node to give her more time to sync the blocks,
essentially behaving like a
time.Sleepas in reality, the blocks wouldnever be generated this fast.