Skip to content

Conversation

@vshanthe
Copy link
Contributor

📝 Description

Maintainers can manually specify the URL of an OpenAPI spec to use when dispatching the E2E test workflow

If applicable, include a screenshot or code snippet of this change. Otherwise, please remove this section.

@lgarber-akamai lgarber-akamai added the repo-ci-improvement for improvements in the repository or CI workflow in the changelog. label Oct 30, 2024
@linode linode deleted a comment from ykim-akamai Nov 11, 2024
@vshanthe vshanthe requested review from ezilber-akamai and ykim-akamai and removed request for ykim-akamai November 11, 2024 06:18
@vshanthe vshanthe requested a review from ykim-akamai November 11, 2024 06:26
module:
description: "The module from 'test/integration' to the target to be tested, e.g. 'cli, domains, events, etc'"
test_path:
description: "The path from 'test/integration' to the target to be tested, e.g. 'cli'"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to take what is in dev for this. I personally think module make things a bit more simpler

sha:
description: 'The hash value of the commit.'
required: true
required: false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we might want to leave this as it is

runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.sha != '' || github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'pull_request'
steps:
- name: Validate Test Path
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you might have merged older local version of dev branch

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes , raised the new PR

@ykim-akamai
Copy link
Contributor

Might want to revert the latest push with resolving merge conflicts and take changes from the latest dev

});
return result;
apply-calico-rules:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These jobs were recently added, let's keep these jobs as it makes the workflow easier to read

@vshanthe
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing this PR - #679

@vshanthe vshanthe closed this Nov 13, 2024
@vshanthe vshanthe deleted the spec_changes branch November 13, 2024 06:27
vshanthe added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

repo-ci-improvement for improvements in the repository or CI workflow in the changelog.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants