-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
Allow overriding spec when manually triggering E2E test workflow #664
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| module: | ||
| description: "The module from 'test/integration' to the target to be tested, e.g. 'cli, domains, events, etc'" | ||
| test_path: | ||
| description: "The path from 'test/integration' to the target to be tested, e.g. 'cli'" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might want to take what is in dev for this. I personally think module make things a bit more simpler
| sha: | ||
| description: 'The hash value of the commit.' | ||
| required: true | ||
| required: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we might want to leave this as it is
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.sha != '' || github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'pull_request' | ||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Validate Test Path |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you might have merged older local version of dev branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes , raised the new PR
|
Might want to revert the latest push with resolving merge conflicts and take changes from the latest dev |
| }); | ||
| return result; | ||
| apply-calico-rules: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These jobs were recently added, let's keep these jobs as it makes the workflow easier to read
|
closing this PR - #679 |
📝 Description
Maintainers can manually specify the URL of an OpenAPI spec to use when dispatching the E2E test workflow
If applicable, include a screenshot or code snippet of this change. Otherwise, please remove this section.