fix: In the prompt interface, the grid is hidden to improve user expe…#454
Conversation
…rience. In the prompt interface, the grid is hidden to improve user experience. 提示界面下,不显示井字格,提升用户体验。 Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-351495.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @lichaofan2008, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
deepin pr auto review代码审查意见经过对 1. 语法逻辑
2. 代码质量
3. 代码性能
4. 代码安全
改进建议代码示例针对代码质量和逻辑的改进建议如下: // 在 videowidget.h 中声明私有辅助函数
private:
void hideGridOverlay();
// 在 videowidget.cpp 中实现
void videowidget::hideGridOverlay()
{
// 提示界面不显示井字格
if (m_pGridLineItem && m_pGridLineItem->isVisible()) {
m_pGridLineItem->hide();
}
if (m_gridlinewidget && m_gridlinewidget->isVisible()) {
m_gridlinewidget->hide();
}
}
void videowidget::showNocam()
{
// ... 其他逻辑 ...
if (m_GridType != Grid_None) {
hideGridOverlay(); // 调用统一函数
}
}
void videowidget::showCamUsed()
{
// ... 其他逻辑 ...
if (m_GridType != Grid_None) {
hideGridOverlay(); // 调用统一函数
}
}
void videowidget::setGridType(GridType type)
{
// ... 其他逻辑 ...
if (type == Grid_None) {
// ... 隐藏逻辑 ...
} else {
if (m_gridlinewidget) m_gridlinewidget->hide();
// 提示界面不显示井字格
// 增加空指针检查,确保逻辑安全
if (!m_SvgItem || !m_SvgItem->isVisible()) {
if (m_pGridLineItem) m_pGridLineItem->show();
} else {
// 如果提示界面正在显示,确保网格是隐藏的
if (m_pGridLineItem) m_pGridLineItem->hide();
}
}
}总结这段代码的修改在功能上是合理的,主要解决了UI显示冲突的问题。主要的改进点在于消除重复代码、增加必要的空指针检查以及确保状态管理的一致性。通过提取公共函数和增加防御性编程,可以提高代码的健壮性和可维护性。 |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lichaofan2008, max-lvs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/forcemerge |
|
This pr force merged! (status: unstable) |
0d20c75
into
linuxdeepin:release/eagle
…rience.
In the prompt interface, the grid is hidden to improve user experience.
提示界面下,不显示井字格,提升用户体验。
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-351495.html