Survey Question on the For loop in source file benchmarks/Cetus/dataracebench/DRB008-indirectaccess4-orig-yes.c line 139

[pdhung3012]

Hello Sir/ Madam
We are from a research group at Iowa State University, USA. We want to do a survey on Github developers on the methods they used for paralleling their code. To do the survey, We want to ask three questions:

1. Have you ever tried to add pragma for that 'for' loop?.

2. How much confidence do you have about the correctness of this implementation? You can choose from 1-5 with 1 as the lowest confidence score and 5 as the highest confidence.

3. (Optional) Do you actually run (interpret the code with compilation and pass input/get output) the code? Yes/No

• If yes, can you provide the information of what are the input and expected output of this program (the input that caused the program to run through this for-loop).

The for loop is from line 139 of file https:/github.com/LLNL/AutoParBench/blob/master/benchmarks/Cetus/dataracebench/DRB008-indirectaccess4-orig-yes.c
Here is a part of the code:

nan
for (i = 0; i < 180; ++i)
{
int idx = indexSet[i];
xa1[idx] += 1.0;
xa2[idx] += 3.0;
}

Sincerely thanks

[gleisonsdm]

Hello,

1. Have you ever tried to add pragma for that 'for' loop?

No, this file was written by Cetus, a compiler that parallelizes code automatically. You can check the correctness using our reports.
For dataracebench, they are at:
Report

2. How much confidence do you have about the correctness of this implementation? You can choose from 1-5 with 1 as the lowest confidence score and 5 as the highest confidence.

5, the loop is not parallelized, thereforth its execution result will be correct.

Regards