-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
fix(cli): handle missing target artifact dir #4112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -224,13 +224,21 @@ exports.findArtifactPaths = async function(dir, artifactType, reader) { | |
| const readdir = reader || readdirAsync; | ||
| debug(`Finding artifact paths at: ${dir}`); | ||
|
|
||
| // Wrapping readdir in case it's not a promise. | ||
| const files = await readdir(dir); | ||
| return _.filter(files, f => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| _.endsWith(f, `${artifactType}.js`) || _.endsWith(f, `${artifactType}.ts`) | ||
| try { | ||
| // Wrapping readdir in case it's not a promise. | ||
| const files = await readdir(dir); | ||
| return files.filter( | ||
| f => | ||
| _.endsWith(f, `${artifactType}.js`) || | ||
| _.endsWith(f, `${artifactType}.ts`), | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| if (err.code === 'ENOENT') { | ||
| // Target directory was not found (e.g. "src/models" does not exist yet). | ||
| return []; | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Question: I assume if the target directory does not exist, it will get created when creating the artifact?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, that's correct. |
||
| } | ||
| throw err; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| /** | ||
| * Parses the files of the target directory and returns matching JavaScript | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to check if the directory exists in advance instead of using the err code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find that approach problematic, because it introduces a race condition - between the time we check if the directory exists, and the time we read the entries, the directory can be deleted or removed.
What are your concerns about my proposed approach?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to deal with the edge case where the directory is removed when the command in running. If so, we'll have to use sync fs apis.
My main concern is to rely on the error code. It would be more authoritative by calling an api to check existence of the directory.
It's not a blocker for the PR, anyway.