Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 1, 2020

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
mem-fs-editor devDependencies major ^6.0.0 -> ^7.0.1

Release Notes

SBoudrias/mem-fs-editor

v7.0.1

Compare Source

v7.0.0

Compare Source


Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from agnes512 and emonddr as code owners June 1, 2020 05:08
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/mem-fs-editor-7.x branch 2 times, most recently from f2f3841 to a46beb4 Compare June 8, 2020 03:22
@bajtos bajtos mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2020
7 tasks
Signed-off-by: Renovate Bot <bot@renovateapp.com>
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/mem-fs-editor-7.x branch from a46beb4 to 7981f93 Compare June 18, 2020 05:25
@raymondfeng
Copy link
Contributor

Close as dup of #5839

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jun 26, 2020

Renovate Ignore Notification

As this PR has been closed unmerged, Renovate will ignore this upgrade and you will not receive PRs for any future 7.x releases. However, if you upgrade to 7.x manually then Renovate will then reenable updates for minor and patch updates automatically.

If this PR was closed by mistake or you changed your mind, you can simply rename this PR and you will soon get a fresh replacement PR opened.

@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/mem-fs-editor-7.x branch June 26, 2020 21:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants