Launcher as a service#42
Conversation
ustulation
commented
Sep 24, 2015
<1> Detailing the Formats and addressing TODO's
…tion for other crates
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To disambiguate it from the "Launcher-Simplified" RFC, this should be renamed to something like "Launcher as a service/daemon".
|
The file name shouldn't contain the prospective RFC number. Also, it should be renamed to match whatever the updated "Feature Name" becomes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This needs fleshed out a bit. It should still be a single paragraph, but it should allow third-party readers to get a rough idea of what the product will be, and this also should allow readers to disambiguate between the other proposed Launcher RFC.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice start for an initial implementation to the RPCs. Might be worth considering some alternatives to the data section formats for the future too. say for example:
{
endpoint: "safe-api/v1.4/nfs/create-dir"
data: {
is_shared: false,
path: "/a/b/c"
is_private: true
...
}
}