Skip to content

Comments

[WEB-2066] fix: completed cycle date picker validation#5265

Merged
SatishGandham merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-completed-cycle-date-picker-validation
Jul 30, 2024
Merged

[WEB-2066] fix: completed cycle date picker validation#5265
SatishGandham merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-completed-cycle-date-picker-validation

Conversation

@anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Jul 30, 2024

Changes:

This PR addresses a bug with the date picker validation for completed cycles. Previously, users were able to open the date range picker popover for completed cycles, which is not intended behavior. Added validation to prevent this issue.

Reference:

[WEB-2066]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the user experience by preventing interaction with completed cycles in the Cycle Details Sidebar.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the control flow for disabling components, ensuring users cannot edit or interact with cycles based on additional conditions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the user interface of the CycleDetailsSidebar by refining the conditions under which components become disabled. In addition to the existing !isEditingAllowed and isArchived checks, the new logic incorporates isCompleted. This ensures that users cannot interact with or modify completed cycles, thus improving the overall user experience by aligning functionalities with workflow expectations.

Changes

File Change Summary
web/core/components/cycles/.../root.tsx Updated disabled property logic in CycleDetailsSidebar to include completed cycles in the disable condition.

Poem

In the sidebar where cycles play,
A new rule comes to light today!
If completed, no edits shall be,
A gentle nudge, "Let it be free!"
So hop along, dear users bright,
Enjoy the flow, and all feels right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 08:23
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3143ff and 56f6b5c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/cycles/analytics-sidebar/root.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
web/core/components/cycles/analytics-sidebar/root.tsx (1)

390-390: LGTM! Ensure isCompleted is correctly set.

The code change correctly disables the DateRangeDropdown when the cycle is completed.

Verify that the isCompleted flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status.

Verification successful

The isCompleted flag is correctly set and used.

The isCompleted flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status and used appropriately within the web/core/components/cycles/analytics-sidebar/root.tsx file.

  • The flag is set as const isCompleted = cycleStatus === "completed";
  • It is used in various conditions to disable or enable components based on the cycle's completion status.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `isCompleted` flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status.

# Test: Search for the `isCompleted` flag usage. Expect: Correct setting of the flag based on cycle status.
rg --type js -A 5 $'const isCompleted = cycleStatus === "completed"'

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `isCompleted` flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status.

# Test: Search for the `isCompleted` flag usage. Expect: Correct setting of the flag based on cycle status.
rg --type js 'isCompleted'

Length of output: 26


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `isCompleted` flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status.

# Test: Search for the `isCompleted` flag usage and assignment. Expect: Correct setting of the flag based on cycle status.
rg --type js -A 10 'isCompleted'

Length of output: 32


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `isCompleted` flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status.

# Test: Search for the `isCompleted` flag usage and assignment. Expect: Correct setting of the flag based on cycle status.
rg --type js 'completed'

Length of output: 232


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `isCompleted` flag is correctly set based on the cycle's status within the specific file.

# Test: Search for the `isCompleted` flag usage and assignment within the specific file.
rg --type js 'isCompleted' web/core/components/cycles/analytics-sidebar/root.tsx

Length of output: 512

@SatishGandham SatishGandham merged commit 6bb534d into preview Jul 30, 2024
@SatishGandham SatishGandham deleted the fix-completed-cycle-date-picker-validation branch July 30, 2024 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants