[WEB-2126] chore: guest and viewer role permission#5347
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance permission management across various components using the new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Frontend
participant Backend
User->>Frontend: Request Access
Frontend->>Backend: Validate User Role
Backend-->>Frontend: Role Validated
Frontend-->>User: Grant Access
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
anmolsinghbhatia
changed the title
… into fix-user-role-permission
… into fix-user-role-permission
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (6)
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/label.py (1)
16-16: Remove trailing whitespace.There is a trailing whitespace on this line. Clean up the whitespace to maintain code quality.
- +Tools
GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[notice] 16-16: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/label.py#L16
Trailing whitespaceapiserver/plane/app/urls/inbox.py (1)
URL Parameter Change: Ensure Consistency Across Codebase and Documentation
The change from
<uuid:issue_id>to<uuid:pk>in the URL pattern may impact API clients. The search results show that<uuid:issue_id>is still used in other parts of the codebase. Ensure that all instances are consistently updated and that relevant documentation and client integrations reflect this change.
- Check for consistency in URL patterns across the codebase.
- Update documentation and client integrations to use
<uuid:pk>where applicable.Analysis chain
Line range hint
43-53:
URL Parameter Change: Update API Clients and Documentation.The change from
<uuid:issue_id>to<uuid:pk>may impact existing API clients. Ensure that all relevant documentation and client integrations are updated to reflect this change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that documentation and client integrations are updated for the URL parameter change. # Test: Search for references to the old and new URL patterns in documentation and client code. rg '<uuid:issue_id>|<uuid:pk>' -A 5Length of output: 35698
web/core/components/auth-screens/not-authorized-view.tsx (1)
8-8: Remove unused import if applicable.The
Unauthorizedimage is imported but not used in the component. If it is unnecessary, consider removing it to keep the code clean.- import Unauthorized from "@/public/auth/unauthorized.svg";web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/exports/page.tsx (1)
33-36: Improve visual feedback for permission levels.The opacity change based on
canPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsprovides visual feedback about permissions. Consider additional visual cues or tooltips for better user understanding.<div className={cn("w-full overflow-y-auto md:pr-9 pr-4", { "opacity-60": !canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions, })} title={!canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions ? "Limited Access" : ""} >web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/estimates/page.tsx (1)
32-39: Improve user feedback for admin permissions.The use of
pointer-events-noneandopacity-60provides visual cues for permissions. Consider additional feedback mechanisms for clarity.<div className={`w-full overflow-y-auto py-8 pr-9 ${canPerformProjectAdminActions ? "" : "pointer-events-none opacity-60"}`} title={!canPerformProjectAdminActions ? "Admin Access Required" : ""} >apiserver/plane/app/views/search/issue.py (1)
76-76: Remove trailing whitespace.There's a trailing whitespace on this line that should be removed to maintain code cleanliness.
- +Tools
GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[notice] 76-76: apiserver/plane/app/views/search/issue.py#L76
Trailing whitespace
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
web/public/auth/unauthorized.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
Files selected for processing (61)
- apiserver/plane/app/permissions/init.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/urls/inbox.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/analytic/base.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/archive.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py (7 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/dashboard/base.py (6 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/exporter/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/external/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py (14 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/activity.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (6 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (12 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/label.py (4 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py (9 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.py (6 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.py (11 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py (17 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.py (11 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py (8 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/search/issue.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/webhook/base.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/favorite.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/label.py (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/pages/(list)/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/automations/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/estimates/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/features/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/header.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/labels/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/layout.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/members/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/sidebar.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/states/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/views/(list)/header.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/api-tokens/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/billing/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/exports/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/members/page.tsx (5 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/webhooks/page.tsx (4 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/sidebar.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/workspace-views/header.tsx (4 hunks)
- web/ce/constants/workspace.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/auth-screens/not-authorized-view.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/pages/list/block-item-action.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/send-project-invitation-modal.tsx (5 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/settings/member-columns.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list-item.tsx (6 hunks)
- web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/constants/dashboard.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/constants/empty-state.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/constants/project.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/hooks/use-favorite-item-details.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/layouts/auth-layout/workspace-wrapper.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/store/user/index.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list.tsx
Additional context used
Ruff
apiserver/plane/app/permissions/__init__.py
15-15:
.base.allow_permissionimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
apiserver/plane/app/permissions/__init__.py
[notice] 15-15: apiserver/plane/app/permissions/init.py#L15
'.base.allow_permission' imported but unused (F401)apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/label.py
[notice] 16-16: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/label.py#L16
Trailing whitespaceapiserver/plane/app/views/search/issue.py
[notice] 76-76: apiserver/plane/app/views/search/issue.py#L76
Trailing whitespace
Biome
web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list-item.tsx
[error] 502-528: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
Additional comments not posted (209)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/billing/page.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Authorization logic improvements.The changes enhance the authorization logic by using
canPerformWorkspaceAdminActionsand rendering a dedicatedNotAuthorizedView. This improves flexibility and user experience.Also applies to: 15-24
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/layout.tsx (1)
Line range hint
14-31:
Potential Security Concern: Verify Access Control.The removal of the MobX
observerand conditional checks for user roles might lead to unauthorized access to project settings. Ensure that access control is handled elsewhere in the application to prevent security vulnerabilities.Verification successful
Access Control is Managed Elsewhere in the Application
The removal of the MobX
observerfrom theProjectSettingLayoutcomponent does not lead to unauthorized access issues, as access control is handled through role and permission checks in other parts of the codebase. These checks ensure that only users with the appropriate roles can access or modify project settings.
- Access control logic is present in various components and services, managing user roles and permissions effectively.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that access control for project settings is handled elsewhere in the application. # Test: Check for access control logic related to project settings. rg --type js --type ts 'ProjectSettingLayout' -A 10Length of output: 2061
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for access control logic related to project settings in the application. # Test: Look for role-based access control or permission checks in the codebase. rg --type js --type ts 'role' -A 5 -B 5 rg --type js --type ts 'permission' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 148866
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/members/page.tsx (1)
5-23: Authorization Checks Added: Looks Good!The addition of user role validation and authorization checks enhances security by preventing unauthorized access to the members' settings page. The use of
NotAuthorizedVieweffectively communicates access restrictions to users.Ensure that these changes integrate well with other parts of the application.
Verification successful
Authorization Checks Are Well Integrated Across the Codebase
The use of
useUserandNotAuthorizedViewis consistent and widespread, indicating that role-based access control is a well-established pattern. The changes in theMembersSettingsPagealign well with existing practices.
- No issues found with the integration of authorization checks.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration with other components that may rely on user role validation. # Test: Check for usage of `useUser` and `NotAuthorizedView` in related components. rg --type js --type ts 'useUser|NotAuthorizedView' -A 10Length of output: 383023
web/core/components/auth-screens/not-authorized-view.tsx (2)
18-22: LGTM! Simplified rendering logic.The refactored logic for determining the image asset is concise and improves maintainability. The use of
sectionandisProjectViewprops enhances flexibility.
13-14: Props update: Ensure consistency across the application.The props
sectionandisProjectViewreplace the oldtypeprop. Verify that all instances ofNotAuthorizedViewin the codebase are updated to use these new props.Verification successful
Props update verified: Instances of
NotAuthorizedViewuse new props.The codebase consistently uses the new
sectionandisProjectViewprops for theNotAuthorizedViewcomponent. No instances of the oldtypeprop were found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the updated props in NotAuthorizedView across the codebase. # Test: Search for NotAuthorizedView usage. Expect: Only occurrences with new props. rg --type tsx -A 5 $'<NotAuthorizedView'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all .tsx files and search for the usage of NotAuthorizedView with new props. fd --extension tsx --exec rg '<NotAuthorizedView' -A 5Length of output: 1396
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/states/page.tsx (3)
23-25: LGTM! Conditional rendering enhances security.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedViewbased on user permissions is correctly implemented, enhancing security and user experience.
6-6: Ensure correct import path for NotAuthorizedView.The import path for
NotAuthorizedViewshould be verified to ensure it points to the correct component location.Verification successful
Import Path Verified for NotAuthorizedView
The import path for
NotAuthorizedViewis correct and points to the existing component location in the codebase.
- The component is located at
./web/core/components/auth-screens/not-authorized-view.tsx.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import path for NotAuthorizedView. # Test: Check if the NotAuthorizedView component exists at the specified path. fd 'not-authorized-view.tsx' --exec echo 'Found: {}'Length of output: 118
16-19: Verify user role and permissions logic.The logic for extracting
canPerformProjectMemberActionsandcurrentProjectRoleshould be verified to ensure it correctly reflects the user's permissions.Verification successful
User Role and Permissions Logic Verified
The
useUserhook retrieves user-related information, includingcanPerformProjectMemberActionsandcurrentProjectRole, from the user store context. The logic for these properties is defined as follows:
currentProjectRole: This is derived from the user's membership information and is computed based on the project ID.canPerformProjectMemberActions: This is a computed property that checks if thecurrentProjectRoleis at leastEUserProjectRoles.MEMBER.The logic correctly reflects the user's permissions by ensuring that actions are only allowed if the user has the appropriate role. No issues were found in the implementation.
- Relevant files:
web/core/store/user/index.tsweb/core/store/user/user-membership.store.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of useUser hook for role and permissions. # Test: Search for the useUser hook implementation. Expect: Correct extraction of permissions and role. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const useUser = () => { $$$ }'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the useUser function across the codebase to locate its definition or import statement. # Search for useUser function or import statement rg 'useUser' -A 5Length of output: 207299
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the context or store definition related to useUser to understand how permissions and roles are set. # Search for the StoreContext definition and its usage related to user roles and permissions rg 'StoreContext' -A 10 # Search for canPerformProjectMemberActions and currentProjectRole in the context or store rg 'canPerformProjectMemberActions|currentProjectRole' -A 5Length of output: 155926
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/features/page.tsx (4)
6-6: Ensure correct import path for NotAuthorizedView.The import path for
NotAuthorizedViewshould be verified to ensure it points to the correct component location.
16-17: Verify user role and permissions logic.The logic for extracting
canPerformProjectAdminActionsandcurrentProjectRoleshould be verified to ensure it correctly reflects the user's permissions.
25-27: LGTM! Conditional rendering enhances security.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedViewbased on user permissions is correctly implemented, enhancing security and user experience.
32-36: Ensure correct usage of isAdmin prop.The
isAdminprop is now directly tied tocanPerformProjectAdminActions. Ensure that this change is consistent with the intended logic throughout the application.web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/exports/page.tsx (3)
25-28: Enhance unauthorized access handling.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedViewprovides a clear message for unauthorized access. Ensure this logic aligns with the application's security requirements.
5-5: Ensure theNotAuthorizedViewcomponent handles all necessary cases.The addition of the
NotAuthorizedViewcomponent improves user feedback. Verify that it covers all scenarios for unauthorized access.
16-17: Verify hooks for role-based actions.The introduction of
canPerformWorkspaceViewerActionsandcanPerformWorkspaceMemberActionshooks enhances role checks. Ensure these hooks are correctly implemented and used.Verification successful
Hooks for Role-Based Actions Verified
The hooks
canPerformWorkspaceViewerActionsandcanPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsare implemented and used across multiple files, indicating they are part of a user role management system. Their usage in conditional checks and UI components confirms their role-based functionality.
- Files Involved:
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/exports/page.tsxweb/core/store/user/index.tsweb/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/members/page.tsxweb/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsxweb/core/layouts/auth-layout/workspace-wrapper.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of role-based action hooks. # Test: Search for the implementation of `canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions` and `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions`. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type tsx $'function canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions' rg --type tsx $'function canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions'Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of role-based action hooks. # Test: Search for the implementation of `canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions` and `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions`. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type ts 'function canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions' rg --type ts 'function canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions'Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of role-based action hooks by searching for their identifiers. # Test: Search for the identifiers `canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions` and `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions` in TypeScript files. rg --type ts 'canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions' rg --type ts 'canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions'Length of output: 2467
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/estimates/page.tsx (3)
6-6: Ensure comprehensive handling inNotAuthorizedView.The use of
NotAuthorizedViewfor unauthorized access is a good addition. Verify its implementation covers all necessary scenarios.
25-27: Enhance unauthorized access handling.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedViewfor project settings is well-implemented. Ensure this aligns with project security policies.
15-15: Verify the new derived value for admin actions.The introduction of
canPerformProjectAdminActionsimproves permission checks. Ensure this value is correctly derived and used throughout the application.Verification successful
The derived value
canPerformProjectAdminActionsis correctly implemented and used.The
canPerformProjectAdminActionsis defined and utilized across various components and pages for permission checks. Its usage in logical conditions and as a prop indicates it is effectively integrated for managing admin actions.
- Definition:
web/core/store/user/index.ts- Usage: Found in components like
delete-issue-modal.tsx,command-palette.tsx, and several settings pages.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `canPerformProjectAdminActions`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `canPerformProjectAdminActions`. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type tsx $'function canPerformProjectAdminActions'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of `canPerformProjectAdminActions` in TypeScript files. rg 'canPerformProjectAdminActions' --type tsLength of output: 2674
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/labels/page.tsx (3)
8-8: Ensure comprehensive handling inNotAuthorizedView.The addition of
NotAuthorizedViewenhances unauthorized access handling. Verify its implementation covers all necessary scenarios.
12-12: Verify hooks for role-based actions.The use of
useUseranduseProjecthooks for role checks is crucial. Ensure these hooks are correctly implemented and used.
38-40: Enhance unauthorized access handling.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedViewfor label settings is effective. Ensure this logic aligns with project security requirements.web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/automations/page.tsx (4)
10-10: IntroduceNotAuthorizedViewfor better UX.The addition of
NotAuthorizedViewimproves the user experience by providing immediate feedback when users lack the necessary permissions.
21-21: UsecanPerformProjectAdminActionsfor permission checks.Introducing
canPerformProjectAdminActionsclarifies the permission logic and helps maintain clean and understandable code.
41-42: Conditional rendering for unauthorized access.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedVieweffectively prevents unauthorized users from accessing the settings page.
48-48: Opacity control based on permissions.Using
canPerformProjectAdminActionsto control section opacity provides a subtle yet effective visual cue about user permissions.web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/pages/(list)/page.tsx (4)
9-9: IntroduceEmptyStatefor restricted access.Adding the
EmptyStatecomponent provides a clear and user-friendly message when access to the project page is disabled.
12-12: UseEmptyStateTypefor consistent messaging.Using
EmptyStateType.DISABLED_PROJECT_PAGEensures consistent messaging across the application when access is restricted.
22-22: AccesscurrentProjectDetailsfor enhanced state management.The inclusion of
currentProjectDetailsfrom theuseProjecthook allows for more robust state management and conditional rendering based on project details.
37-45: Conditional rendering based onpage_view.The conditional check for
currentProjectDetails?.page_vieweffectively manages access control and provides appropriate feedback to users.web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/sidebar.tsx (2)
4-4: Wrap component withobserverfor reactivity.Wrapping
ProjectSettingsSidebarwithobserverallows it to reactively update in response to changes in MobX observable state, enhancing its responsiveness.
16-16: Enhance component interactivity with MobX.The use of
observerintegrates MobX's state management capabilities, making theProjectSettingsSidebarmore dynamic and interactive.apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.py (3)
7-12: Clarify role values mapping.The
ROLE_VALUESdictionary provides a clear mapping of roles to numeric values, which is crucial for permission checks. Ensure that these values align with the rest of the system's role hierarchy.
15-16: Ensure role values are comprehensive.The
get_role_valuesfunction retrieves numeric values for roles. Make sure all roles used throughout the application are covered inROLE_VALUES.Verification successful
Role Values Are Comprehensive
The roles defined in
ROLE_VALUES("ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", "GUEST") are used consistently throughout the application. No additional roles were found that are not covered byROLE_VALUES.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all roles used in the application are covered in ROLE_VALUES. # Test: Search for role usage across the codebase. Expect: All roles have corresponding entries in ROLE_VALUES. rg --type python 'role' | grep -i 'role' | grep -v 'ROLE_VALUES'Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the definition of ROLE_VALUES and list its entries rg --type py 'ROLE_VALUES' -A 5 # Search for all instances of role usage in Python files rg --type py 'role' | grep -i 'role'Length of output: 21723
19-59: Review permission logic inallow_permission.The
allow_permissiondecorator effectively checks user roles and creator status. Ensure that:
- The logic for checking workspace and project permissions is correct.
- The
modelparameter is used securely to prevent unauthorized access.- The decorator is applied consistently across views requiring permission checks.
Verification successful
Consistent Application of
allow_permissionDecorator VerifiedThe
allow_permissiondecorator is applied consistently across various views in the codebase. The search results show its usage in multiple files and functions, indicating that permission checks are implemented where necessary. This supports the review comment's concern about ensuring consistent application.
- Files with
allow_permissionusage:
apiserver/plane/app/views/exporter/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/favorite.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/webhook/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/external/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/label.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/activity.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/archive.pyapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.pyThis indicates that the decorator is widely used to enforce permission checks.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent application of `allow_permission` decorator across views. # Test: Search for views using `allow_permission`. Expect: All relevant views have the decorator applied. rg --type python '@allow_permission'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent application of `allow_permission` decorator across views. # Test: Search for views using `allow_permission`. Expect: All relevant views have the decorator applied. rg '@allow_permission' --glob '*.py' -A 5Length of output: 62242
web/core/hooks/use-favorite-item-details.tsx (2)
9-12: Use optional chaining for safety.Optional chaining (
?.) is used to safely access properties offavorite. This prevents runtime errors iffavoriteor its nested properties are undefined.
9-12: Update function signature to reflect optional parameter.The function signature should reflect that
favoritecan be optional by usingfavorite?: IFavorite. This aligns with the use of optional chaining.web/ce/constants/workspace.ts (2)
20-20: Verify role update for "Members" section.The access level for the "Members" section has been changed to
VIEWER. Ensure this change aligns with the overall permission strategy and does not expose sensitive member information.Verification successful
No sensitive data exposure found in "Members" section.
The change in access level to
VIEWERfor the "Members" section does not expose any sensitive data. This update aligns with the permission strategy without compromising data security.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implications of changing access level for "Members" to VIEWER. # Test: Check for any sensitive data exposure in the "Members" section. Expect: No sensitive data is exposed. rg --type tsx 'members' | grep -i 'sensitive'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implications of changing access level for "Members" to VIEWER. # Test: Check for any sensitive data exposure in the "Members" section. Expect: No sensitive data is exposed. rg --type ts 'members' | grep -i 'sensitive' rg --type jsx 'members' | grep -i 'sensitive'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implications of changing access level for "Members" to VIEWER. # Test: Check for any sensitive data exposure in the "Members" section. Expect: No sensitive data is exposed. rg --type ts 'members' | grep -i 'sensitive' rg --type js 'members' | grep -i 'sensitive'Length of output: 85
36-36: Verify role update for "Exports" section.The access level for the "Exports" section has been changed to
VIEWER. Ensure this change is intended and does not allow unauthorized data export.web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/sidebar.tsx (3)
16-16: Import theuseUserhook.The
useUserhook has been imported to manage user permissions in the sidebar. Ensure that this hook is correctly implemented and provides the necessary user data.
26-26: Use ofcanPerformWorkspaceMemberActions.The
canPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsfunction is extracted from theuseUserhook to conditionally render components. This improves the sidebar's responsiveness to user permissions.
89-89: Conditional rendering ofSidebarFavoritesMenu.The
SidebarFavoritesMenuis now conditionally rendered based on thecanPerformWorkspaceMemberActionspermission. This ensures that only users with the appropriate permissions see this menu.apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/activity.py (2)
22-22: Import theallow_permissiondecorator.The
allow_permissiondecorator is imported for use in the endpoint. Ensure that this decorator is correctly implemented and enforces the intended permissions.
36-36: Applyallow_permissiondecorator togetmethod.The
allow_permissiondecorator is applied to thegetmethod, restricting access to users with "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "GUEST", and "VIEWER" roles. This enhances access control for the endpoint.apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py (4)
18-18: Import theallow_permissiondecorator.The
allow_permissiondecorator is imported to manage permissions at the method level. Ensure that this decorator is correctly implemented and enforces the intended permissions.
25-25: Applyallow_permissiondecorator topostmethod.The
allow_permissiondecorator is applied to thepostmethod, allowing "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "GUEST" roles to create attachments. This broadens access while maintaining control.
47-47: Applyallow_permissiondecorator todeletemethod.The
allow_permissiondecorator is applied to thedeletemethod, allowing only "ADMIN" users and the creator of the attachment to delete it. This ensures that deletions are controlled and secure.
66-66: Applyallow_permissiondecorator togetmethod.The
allow_permissiondecorator is applied to thegetmethod, allowing "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "GUEST", and "VIEWER" roles to access attachments. This enhances accessibility while maintaining security.apiserver/plane/app/views/exporter/base.py (2)
65-65: Ensure consistent permission handling.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is used for bothpostandgetmethods. Verify that this approach is consistently applied across other endpoints requiring similar permissions.Verification successful
Consistent Permission Handling Verified
The
@allow_permissiondecorator is consistently used across various endpoints in the codebase, with different roles and levels tailored to specific needs. This indicates a consistent approach to permission management.
- Examples found in files like
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/favorite.py,apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py, and many others.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `@allow_permission` across other endpoints. # Test: Search for usage of `@allow_permission`. Expect: Consistent application across similar endpoints. rg --type python '@allow_permission'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `@allow_permission` across other endpoints. # Test: Search for usage of `@allow_permission`. Expect: Consistent application across similar endpoints. rg -t py '@allow_permission'Length of output: 11556
18-18: Verify the implementation of@allow_permission.The
@allow_permissiondecorator introduces a new way to handle permissions. Ensure that its implementation correctly validates roles and levels as intended.Verification successful
The
@allow_permissiondecorator correctly validates roles and levels.The implementation of the
allow_permissiondecorator includes logic for checking user roles and levels. It verifies if the user has the required role within a workspace or project context and handles creator-specific permissions if necessary. If the user does not meet the conditions, it returns a permission denied response.
- The decorator checks for creator permissions if the
creatorflag is set and amodelis provided.- It validates roles based on the
levelparameter, supporting both "WORKSPACE" and other levels.- If the conditions are not met, it responds with an unauthorized error message.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `@allow_permission` decorator. # Test: Search for the implementation of `@allow_permission`. Expect: Correct validation of roles and levels. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def allow_permission(roles, level):\n $$$\n'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search for the `allow_permission` decorator by looking for its definition and usage. # This will help locate its implementation and understand its functionality. # Search for the definition of `allow_permission` in the codebase. rg 'def allow_permission' -A 10 # Search for any usage of `allow_permission` as a decorator. rg '@allow_permission'Length of output: 12452
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more lines from the `allow_permission` implementation to understand its logic. # Get the full implementation of `allow_permission` to ensure correct validation of roles and levels. rg 'def allow_permission' -A 50 apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.pyLength of output: 1670
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/header.tsx (2)
73-83: Validate link rendering based on access levels.The rendering of links is conditional on
projectMemberInfomeeting or exceedingitem.access. Ensure this logic correctly reflects intended access control.Verification successful
Link Rendering Logic is Correctly Implemented
The
PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKSarray defines access levels using theaccessproperty, which aligns with the conditional rendering logic in the code. The logic correctly checks ifprojectMemberInfomeets or exceeds the required access level to render each link. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify link rendering logic based on access levels. # Test: Search for `PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKS` and verify access level conditions. Expect: Correct conditional rendering. rg --type js 'PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKS'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKS` across all file types to understand its structure. rg 'PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKS'Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition of `PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKS` to verify its structure and access levels. rg --type js --context 10 'PROJECT_SETTINGS_LINKS' web/core/constants/project.tsLength of output: 1738
27-27: Review role assignment logic.The
projectMemberInfovariable defaults toEUserProjectRoles.GUESTifcurrentProjectRoleis undefined. Ensure this logic aligns with intended role assignments.Verification successful
Role assignment logic is consistent.
The
projectMemberInfovariable defaults toEUserProjectRoles.GUESTwhencurrentProjectRoleis undefined, which aligns with the usage ofEUserProjectRolesacross the codebase. This behavior appears intentional and consistent with the role hierarchy.
EUserProjectRolesis defined as an enum with roles includingGUEST,VIEWER,MEMBER, andADMIN.- The default assignment to
GUESTis used consistently in other parts of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the role assignment logic for `projectMemberInfo`. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `EUserProjectRoles.GUEST`. Expect: Logical default assignment. rg --type js 'EUserProjectRoles.GUEST'Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `EUserProjectRoles` to understand its context. rg --type js 'EUserProjectRoles' # Search for the usage of `projectMemberInfo` to see how it is used in the codebase. rg --type js 'projectMemberInfo'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of `EUserProjectRoles` in both JavaScript and TypeScript files. rg --type-add 'jsts:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' --type jsts 'EUserProjectRoles' # Search for the definition and usage of `projectMemberInfo` in both JavaScript and TypeScript files. rg --type-add 'jsts:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' --type jsts 'projectMemberInfo' # Search for import/export statements related to `EUserProjectRoles` to find its module. rg --type jsts 'import.*EUserProjectRoles|export.*EUserProjectRoles'Length of output: 25962
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/api-tokens/page.tsx (2)
45-46: Check unauthorized view rendering.The
NotAuthorizedViewcomponent is used for unauthorized access. Ensure it provides a consistent user experience across different unauthorized scenarios.Verification successful
Consistent unauthorized view rendering confirmed.
The
NotAuthorizedViewcomponent is consistently used across multiple settings pages to handle unauthorized access, ensuring a uniform user experience. The component is defined inweb/core/components/auth-screens/not-authorized-view.tsxand imported in various settings-related files.
- Component Definition:
web/core/components/auth-screens/not-authorized-view.tsx- Consistent Usage: Confirmed in multiple settings-related pages.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and rendering logic of `NotAuthorizedView`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `NotAuthorizedView`. Expect: Consistent user experience for unauthorized access. rg --type js 'NotAuthorizedView'Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `NotAuthorizedView` component definition in the codebase using `ast-grep`. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function NotAuthorizedView($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const NotAuthorizedView = ($_$$$) => { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'class NotAuthorizedView { $$$ }'Length of output: 238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for `NotAuthorizedView` in TypeScript files and check for import statements. rg --type ts 'NotAuthorizedView' rg --type ts 'import .*NotAuthorizedView'Length of output: 4838
32-32: VerifycanPerformWorkspaceAdminActionslogic.The
canPerformWorkspaceAdminActionsproperty is used to determine admin capabilities. Ensure its implementation correctly encapsulates necessary permissions.web/core/components/pages/list/block-item-action.tsx (3)
15-15: Import addition approved.The addition of
useProjectis necessary for fetching project details.
30-38: Logic changes approved.The logic for fetching project details and determining user roles is correctly implemented.
84-93: Conditional rendering approved.The
FavoriteStarcomponent is correctly rendered only for users who are not viewers or guests.apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/favorite.py (1)
17-17: Decorator usage approved.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is correctly applied to enhance permission management for HTTP methods.Also applies to: 35-35, 48-48, 61-61, 72-72
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/webhooks/page.tsx (2)
27-35: Authorization logic approved.The use of
canPerformWorkspaceAdminActionsfor authorization checks and data fetching is correctly implemented.
45-47: Rendering logic approved.The
NotAuthorizedViewcomponent is correctly rendered for unauthorized users.apiserver/plane/app/views/search/issue.py (1)
77-85: Verify role-based filtering logic.The added logic filters issues created by the user if they have role 5. Ensure that this role is correctly defined and that the logic aligns with the intended permission model.
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/label.py (2)
46-46: Confirmallow_permissiondecorator usage.The
allow_permissiondecorator is applied to enforce role-based access. Ensure that the roles specified ("ADMIN", "MEMBER") align with the intended access control policies.Also applies to: 69-69, 76-76, 82-82
Verification successful
Consistent use of
allow_permissiondecorator with specified roles.The
allow_permissiondecorator with roles["ADMIN", "MEMBER"]is consistently applied across multiple files and methods, indicating alignment with the intended access control policies. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `allow_permission` decorator roles. # Test: Search for the `allow_permission` decorator to ensure roles are correctly assigned. rg --type python '@allow_permission\(\["ADMIN", "MEMBER"\]\)' -A 5Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `allow_permission` decorator roles. # Test: Search for the `allow_permission` decorator with specified roles. rg '@allow_permission\(\["ADMIN", "MEMBER"\]\)' --glob '*.py' -A 5Length of output: 19640
14-14: Ensure compatibility withProjectBasePermission.The permission class has been updated to
ProjectBasePermission. Verify that this class provides the necessary permissions and is compatible with the existing logic.Verification successful
ProjectBasePermissionis compatible with existing logic.The
ProjectBasePermissionclass is implemented with methods to handle user permissions based on roles and request methods, ensuring appropriate access control. This confirms its compatibility and correctness within the codebase.
- The
has_permissionmethod effectively checks user roles and request types to grant or deny access.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `ProjectBasePermission`. # Test: Search for the definition of `ProjectBasePermission` to ensure it contains the necessary logic. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ProjectBasePermission($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `ProjectBasePermission`. # Test: Correct the pattern to search for the definition of `ProjectBasePermission`. ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'class ProjectBasePermission:'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any mention of `ProjectBasePermission` across the codebase to gather more context. rg 'ProjectBasePermission'Length of output: 922
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full definition of `ProjectBasePermission` from its source file. ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'class ProjectBasePermission: $$$' apiserver/plane/app/permissions/project.pyLength of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract lines around the definition of `ProjectBasePermission` to verify its structure. rg -A 20 'class ProjectBasePermission' apiserver/plane/app/permissions/project.pyLength of output: 885
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/views/(list)/header.tsx (1)
79-83: Assess impact of always rendering "Add view" button.The "Add view" button is now always rendered, regardless of user permissions. Ensure this change aligns with the intended functionality and does not compromise access control.
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/members/page.tsx (5)
12-12: Import Addition Approved.The addition of
NotAuthorizedViewis appropriate as it is used for rendering unauthorized access views.
32-34: Permission Hooks Integration Approved.The new hooks
canPerformWorkspaceAdminActions,canPerformWorkspaceViewerActions, andcanPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsimprove clarity and maintainability by encapsulating permission logic.
88-91: Unauthorized Access Handling Approved.The conditional rendering of
NotAuthorizedViewensures that users without viewer permissions are appropriately redirected, enhancing security.
101-104: Conditional Styling Approved.The conditional opacity styling based on
canPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsprovides a clear visual cue regarding user permissions.
118-120: "Add Member" Button Logic Approved.The visibility of the "Add member" button is correctly controlled by
canPerformWorkspaceAdminActions, aligning with the permission model.apiserver/plane/app/views/webhook/base.py (7)
12-12: Import Addition Approved.The addition of the
allow_permissionimport is necessary for the updated permission handling logic.
18-20: Permission Decorator Approved for POST Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thepostmethod for users with the "ADMIN" role.
41-43: Permission Decorator Approved for GET Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thegetmethod for users with the "ADMIN" role.
81-83: Permission Decorator Approved for PATCH Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thepatchmethod for users with the "ADMIN" role.
107-109: Permission Decorator Approved for DELETE Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thedeletemethod for users with the "ADMIN" role.
116-118: Permission Decorator Approved for WebhookSecretRegenerateEndpoint POST Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thepostmethod for users with the "ADMIN" role.
127-129: Permission Decorator Approved for WebhookLogsEndpoint GET Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thegetmethod for users with the "ADMIN" role.apiserver/plane/app/views/external/base.py (3)
14-16: Import Addition Approved.The addition of the
allow_permissionimport is necessary for the updated permission handling logic.
27-29: Permission Decorator Approved for GPTIntegrationEndpoint POST Method.The
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])decorator correctly restricts access to thepostmethod for users with the "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" role.
88-90: Permission Decorator Approved for WorkspaceGPTIntegrationEndpoint POST Method.The
@allow_permission(roles=["ADMIN", "MEMBER"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator correctly restricts access to thepostmethod for users with the "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" role.web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/workspace-views/header.tsx (1)
139-142: Review the impact of removing role-based checks.The removal of the
isAuthorizedUsercheck means the "Add view" button is now accessible to all users, regardless of their role. This could lead to unauthorized access to functionality intended for specific roles.Please ensure that this change aligns with the intended access control policies. If necessary, consider reintroducing role-based checks to maintain security.
web/core/components/project/settings/member-columns.tsx (1)
103-114: Ensure role-checking logic aligns with intended permissions.The
checkCurrentOptionWorkspaceRolefunction filters roles based on the current user's workspace role. Verify that this logic correctly reflects the intended role hierarchy and permissions.Please confirm that the filtering logic meets the project's requirements for role management.
web/core/constants/project.ts (1)
82-90: Review changes to access levels for project settings.The access levels for "General" and "Members" settings have been lowered, allowing broader access. Ensure these changes align with your security policies and do not inadvertently grant unauthorized access.
Please review the broader impact of these changes on access control and user permissions.
web/core/layouts/auth-layout/workspace-wrapper.tsx (1)
75-80: Ensure consistent permission checks for fetching data.The conditional check for
canPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsbefore fetching workspace favorites is a good addition. Ensure similar permission checks are applied consistently across other data fetching logic to maintain security and access control.Verification successful
Consistent Permission Checks Verified
The search results indicate that
canPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsis used consistently across various components in the codebase to control access and permissions. This includes its use inworkspace-wrapper.tsx,command-palette.tsx, and several other files, ensuring that permission checks are applied uniformly for data fetching and UI interactions.
- Files with permission checks:
web/core/layouts/auth-layout/workspace-wrapper.tsxweb/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsxweb/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/sidebar.tsxweb/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/members/page.tsxweb/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/settings/exports/page.tsxThese checks help maintain security and access control throughout the application.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent permission checks for data fetching. # Test: Search for conditional checks involving `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions`. rg --type tsx 'canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent permission checks for data fetching. # Test: Search for conditional checks involving `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions` in .ts and .tsx files. rg 'canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1759
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py (3)
123-123: Check creator condition for comment deletion.The
destroymethod restricts access to "ADMIN" and the creator of the comment. Ensure this condition is correctly implemented and aligns with the application's requirements.Verification successful
Creator Condition for Comment Deletion is Correctly Implemented
The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly enforces the creator condition by checking if the user is the creator of theIssueCommentbefore allowing deletion. This aligns with the application's requirements.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the creator condition enforcement in `destroy`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `allow_permission` to ensure correct enforcement. rg --type py 'allow_permission'Length of output: 14565
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the implementation of `allow_permission` to verify how the `creator` condition is enforced. # Locate the implementation of `allow_permission` in the permissions module. rg --type py 'def allow_permission' -A 20Length of output: 1720
66-66: Verify role inclusivity for comment creation.The
createmethod now allows roles "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "GUEST", and "VIEWER". Verify that this inclusivity aligns with the application's security policies and user role definitions.
91-91: Ensure creator condition is correctly enforced.The
partial_updatemethod includes a creator condition. Verify that theallow_permissiondecorator correctly enforces this condition for the intended roles.Verification successful
Creator Condition is Correctly Enforced in
allow_permissionDecoratorThe
allow_permissiondecorator correctly enforces the creator condition by checking if the user is the creator of the object before proceeding with role-based permission checks. This ensures that only the creator can perform actions on their objects, as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the enforcement of the creator condition in `partial_update`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `allow_permission` to ensure correct enforcement. rg --type py 'allow_permission'Length of output: 14565
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the allow_permission function to verify the enforcement of the creator condition. ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def allow_permission(roles, level="PROJECT", creator=False, model=None): {$$$}' apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.pyLength of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the allow_permission function to verify the enforcement of the creator condition. rg 'def allow_permission' -A 20 apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.pyLength of output: 910
web/core/constants/dashboard.ts (2)
282-282: Confirm role change impact on user experience.The access role for the "Cycles" menu item has been changed from
GUESTtoMEMBER. Verify that this change aligns with user access requirements and does not negatively impact user experience for non-member roles.
320-320: Review access role for "Your work" menu item.The access role for the "Your work" menu item has been updated to
MEMBER. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control strategy and does not restrict necessary access for other roles.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Access role update aligns with existing access control logic.
The update to use
EUserWorkspaceRoles.MEMBERfor the "Your work" menu item is consistent with the access control strategy observed in the codebase. This role is used as a baseline for authorization across various components, ensuring that the change does not restrict necessary access for other roles.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of role change on user experience for "Your work". # Test: Search for documentation or code comments related to access requirements. rg --type ts 'Your work'Length of output: 795
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of EUserWorkspaceRoles.MEMBER in the codebase to understand its usage. rg 'EUserWorkspaceRoles\.MEMBER' --type ts -A 5 # Search for all references to the "Your work" menu item to see how access control is implemented. rg 'Your work' --type ts -A 5Length of output: 15163
apiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.py (2)
231-231: Verify deletion logic indestroymethod.Ensure that all related data and references are appropriately cleaned up when an estimate point is deleted.
Verification successful
Deletion logic in
destroymethod is correctly implemented.The method updates related issues and rearranges keys of remaining estimate points before deleting the old estimate point, ensuring proper cleanup and maintenance of data integrity.
- The method updates issues to a new estimate point ID if provided.
- It rearranges the keys of remaining estimate points to maintain order.
- Finally, it deletes the old estimate point.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deletion logic for the `destroy` method in `EstimatePointEndpoint`. # Test: Check for related cleanup logic in the codebase. Expect: References and related data are handled. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def destroy(self, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_):\n $$$\n old_estimate_point.delete()'Length of output: 3444
27-27: Verify the expanded access forgetmethod.The
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator broadens access to thegetmethod. Ensure this change aligns with the security model and that exposing this data to VIEWER roles is intended.web/core/store/user/index.ts (8)
295-297: LGTM: Workspace admin actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for workspace admin role permissions.
303-304: LGTM: Workspace member actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for workspace member role permissions or higher.
312-313: LGTM: Workspace viewer actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for workspace viewer role permissions or higher.
320-321: LGTM: Workspace guest actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for workspace guest role permissions or higher.
325-327: LGTM: Project admin actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for project admin role permissions.
336-337: LGTM: Project member actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for project member role permissions or higher.
345-346: LGTM: Project viewer actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for project viewer role permissions or higher.
353-354: LGTM: Project guest actions logic.The computed property correctly checks for project guest role permissions or higher.
apiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.py (4)
308-308: Verify deletion logic indestroymethod.Ensure that all related data and references are appropriately cleaned up when a module issue is deleted.
95-95: Verify the expanded access forlistmethod.The
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator broadens access to thelistmethod. Ensure this change aligns with the security model and that exposing this data to VIEWER roles is intended.
203-203: Verify bulk creation logic increate_module_issuesmethod.Ensure that all necessary validations are in place for the bulk creation of module issues to maintain data integrity.
245-245: Verify module management logic increate_issue_modulesmethod.Ensure that the logic for adding and removing modules is consistent and handles all edge cases, maintaining data integrity.
web/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsx (1)
46-47: Update Permission Logic: Ensure Correctness of Member Action ChecksThe properties
canPerformProjectMemberActionsandcanPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsreplace the previous creation action checks. Verify that these properties correctly reflect the intended permissions for member-level actions.Verification successful
Verified: Member Action Permission Logic is Correct
The properties
canPerformProjectMemberActionsandcanPerformWorkspaceMemberActionsare correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase to control access to member-level actions. Their definitions and usage align with the intended permission checks.
- Defined as booleans with computed properties in
web/core/store/user/index.ts.- Used in
web/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsxand other components to conditionally perform actions based on user permissions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and definition of `canPerformProjectMemberActions` and `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definitions and usages of these properties. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type tsx 'canPerform(Project|Workspace)MemberActions'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and definition of `canPerformProjectMemberActions` and `canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definitions and usages of these properties in TypeScript files. rg 'canPerform(Project|Workspace)MemberActions' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 2946
apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py (3)
326-326: Verify Permission Decorator:destroyMethodThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])decorator is applied to thedestroymethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for deleting cycle issues.Verification successful
Verified Permission Decorator for
destroyMethodThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])decorator is indeed applied to thedestroymethod in theapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.pyfile. This matches the intended access control for deleting cycle issues.
- File:
apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py- Line: 326
The application of the decorator aligns with the specified roles, confirming the correct implementation of access control for this method.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `destroy` method. # Test: Search for the `destroy` method in the codebase to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet {\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])\n def destroy(self, request, slug, project_id, cycle_id, issue_id):\n $$$\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 772
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `destroy` method with corrected pattern. # Corrected Test: Search for the `destroy` method in the codebase to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet:\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])\n def destroy(self, request, slug, project_id, cycle_id, issue_id):\n $$$\n $$$'Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `destroy` method in the codebase to verify its existence and decorators. # Search for the `destroy` method in any class to check its existence. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def destroy(self, $$$):\n $$$' # Search for any decorators applied to the `destroy` method. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'@$_\ndef destroy(self, $$$):\n $$$'Length of output: 103761
230-230: Verify Permission Decorator:createMethodThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])decorator is applied to thecreatemethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for creating cycle issues.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Permission Decorator on
createMethodThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])decorator is correctly applied to thecreatemethod in theCycleIssueViewSetclass. This aligns with the intended access control for creating cycle issues.
- File:
apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py- Method:
createScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `create` method. # Test: Search for the `create` method in the codebase to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet {\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])\n def create(self, request, slug, project_id, cycle_id):\n $$$\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 750
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected the pattern to match Python's syntax for the `create` method in the `CycleIssueViewSet` class. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet:\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"])\n def create(self, request, slug, project_id, cycle_id):\n $$$\n'Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `CycleIssueViewSet` class definition in the codebase. ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'class CycleIssueViewSet:\n $$$\n' # Search for all `create` methods in the codebase to find their decorators. ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def create(self, $$$):\n $$$\n'Length of output: 833
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the `CycleIssueViewSet` class and list its methods. rg -A 10 'class CycleIssueViewSet' --glob '*.py' # Use ripgrep to search for the `create` method and its decorators. rg -A 3 'def create' --glob '*.py'Length of output: 34000
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `create` method in `apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py` and include context lines to capture decorators. rg -A 5 -B 2 'def create' apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.pyLength of output: 322
83-83: Verify Permission Decorator:listMethodThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator is applied to thelistmethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for listing cycle issues.Verification successful
Permission Decorator Verified:
listMethodThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator is correctly applied to thelistmethod inapiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py. This aligns with the intended access control for listing cycle issues. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `list` method. # Test: Search for the `list` method in the codebase to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet {\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])\n def list(self, request, slug, project_id, cycle_id):\n $$$\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 766
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `list` method with corrected syntax. # Test: Search for the `list` method in the codebase to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet:\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])\n def list(self, request, slug, project_id, cycle_id):\n $$$\n $$$\n'Length of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `list` method in the `CycleIssueViewSet` class to verify its existence and definition. # Test: Search for the `list` method within the `CycleIssueViewSet` class. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet:\n $$$\n def list(self, $_$$):\n $$$\n $$$\n'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `CycleIssueViewSet` class to verify its existence. # Test: Search for the `CycleIssueViewSet` class in the codebase. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CycleIssueViewSet:\n $$$\n' # Description: Search for any `list` methods in the codebase. # Test: Search for `list` methods in the codebase. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def list($_$$):\n $$$\n'Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of the `@allow_permission` decorator in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `@allow_permission` decorator usage. rg '@allow_permission' -A 5Length of output: 62228
apiserver/plane/app/views/analytic/base.py (4)
203-203: Verify Permission Decorator:getMethod inSavedAnalyticEndpointThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator is applied to thegetmethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for retrieving saved analytics.
299-299: Verify Permission Decorator:getMethod inDefaultAnalyticsEndpointThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", "GUEST"])decorator is applied to thegetmethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for default analytics data.Verification successful
Verified: Permission Decorator on
getMethod inDefaultAnalyticsEndpointThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", "GUEST"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator is correctly applied to thegetmethod in theDefaultAnalyticsEndpointclass. This aligns with the intended access control for default analytics data.
- Location:
apiserver/plane/app/views/analytic/base.pyScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `get` method of `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint`. # Test: Search for the `get` method in the `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint` class to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint {\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", "GUEST"], level="WORKSPACE")\n def get(self, request, slug):\n $$$\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 790
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `get` method of `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint`. # Corrected Test: Search for the `get` method in the `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint` class to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint:\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", "GUEST"], level="WORKSPACE")\n def get(self, request, slug):\n $$$\n $$$\n'Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List methods in the `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint` class to verify the presence of the `get` method and its decorators. # Search for the `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint` class and list its methods. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint:\n $$$\n' --json | jq -r '.[] | .matches[] | select(.kind == "function_definition") | .name'Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint` class definition in the codebase. # Use ripgrep to search for the class definition across the codebase. rg 'class DefaultAnalyticsEndpoint' --glob '*.py' -A 5Length of output: 577
234-234: Verify Permission Decorator:postMethod inExportAnalyticsEndpointThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator is applied to thepostmethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for exporting analytics data.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Permission Decorator on
postMethod inExportAnalyticsEndpointThe
ExportAnalyticsEndpointclass indeed contains apostmethod with the@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"], level="WORKSPACE")decorator. This aligns with the intended access control for exporting analytics data as described in the review comment. The verification confirms that the decorator is correctly applied.
- File:
apiserver/plane/app/views/analytic/base.py- Class:
ExportAnalyticsEndpoint- Method:
postScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `post` method of `ExportAnalyticsEndpoint`. # Test: Search for the `post` method in the `ExportAnalyticsEndpoint` class to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ExportAnalyticsEndpoint {\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"], level="WORKSPACE")\n def post(self, request, slug):\n $$$\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 772
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify the usage of `@allow_permission` in the `post` method of `ExportAnalyticsEndpoint`. # Test: Search for the `post` method in the `ExportAnalyticsEndpoint` class to ensure the correct application of the `@allow_permission` decorator. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ExportAnalyticsEndpoint:\n $$$\n @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"], level="WORKSPACE")\n def post(self, request, slug):\n $$$\n $$$\n'Length of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the ExportAnalyticsEndpoint class and list all its methods to verify existence and decorators. # Find the ExportAnalyticsEndpoint class definition ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ExportAnalyticsEndpoint:\n $$$\n' # List all methods in the ExportAnalyticsEndpoint class ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ExportAnalyticsEndpoint:\n $$$\n def $_($$):\n $$$\n $$$\n'Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any class names containing "ExportAnalytics" and list all their methods to verify existence and decorators. # Find all class definitions containing "ExportAnalytics" rg --pcre2 --multiline --multiline-dotall 'class\s+.*ExportAnalytics.*:\s*' -A 10 # Search for any `post` methods with decorators in the codebase rg --pcre2 --multiline --multiline-dotall '@allow_permission\(\[.*\]\)\s*def post\(' -A 5Length of output: 163785
23-23: Verify Permission Decorator:getMethod inAnalyticsEndpointThe
@allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER"])decorator is applied to thegetmethod. Ensure that this aligns with the intended access control for fetching analytics data.apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (5)
99-99: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thelistmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
215-215: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to theretrievemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
259-259: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thearchivemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
298-298: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to theunarchivemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
330-330: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thepostmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.apiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.py (10)
43-45: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thelistmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
175-177: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thepartial_updatemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
195-195: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to themark_readmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
205-205: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to themark_unreadmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
215-215: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thearchivemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
225-225: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to theunarchivemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
238-240: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thegetmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
279-279: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thecreatemethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
363-363: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thegetmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
374-374: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thepatchmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py (5)
67-67: LGTM: Permission decorator and role validation added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thecreatemethod, and the role validation logic ensures users cannot be assigned roles higher than their workspace role.
192-192: LGTM: Permission decorator added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thelistmethod, aligning with the intended permission changes.
207-207: LGTM: Permission decorator and role update validation added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thepartial_updatemethod, and the role update validation logic prevents unauthorized role escalations.
264-264: LGTM: Permission decorator and removal validation added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to thedestroymethod, and the logic prevents self-removal and unauthorized removals.
301-301: LGTM: Permission decorator and leave validation added correctly.The
@allow_permissiondecorator is appropriately applied to theleavemethod, and the logic prevents leaving if the user is the only admin.web/core/components/project/send-project-invitation-modal.tsx (5)
59-60: Enhance form state management withwatchandsetValueThe addition of
watchandsetValueimproves dynamic form updates. Ensure that these functions are used correctly to manage form state changes.
172-183: ReviewcheckCurrentOptionWorkspaceRolefunctionThe function
checkCurrentOptionWorkspaceRolefilters roles based on the current member's workspace role. Ensure that the logic correctly restricts roles for guests and viewers.
297-299: UsecheckCurrentOptionWorkspaceRolefor role optionsThe use of
checkCurrentOptionWorkspaceRoleensures that role options are contextually relevant. Verify that the function is used consistently across the component.
15-15: ImportEUserWorkspaceRolesandROLEThe import of
EUserWorkspaceRolesandROLEindicates enhanced role management capabilities. Ensure these constants are correctly defined and used consistently throughout the code.Verification successful
Definitions and Usage of
EUserWorkspaceRolesandROLEVerifiedThe
EUserWorkspaceRolesandROLEconstants are defined and used consistently across multiple files in the codebase, indicating proper role management implementation. Here are the key points:
Definition:
EUserWorkspaceRolesis defined as an enum inweb/core/constants/workspace.ts.ROLEis also defined in the same file.Usage:
- These constants are imported and used in various files for role management, such as checking user roles and setting access levels.
This confirms that
EUserWorkspaceRolesandROLEare correctly defined and utilized throughout the codebase. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the definition of EUserWorkspaceRoles and ROLE in the codebase. rg --type typescript 'EUserWorkspaceRoles|ROLE'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correcting the file type to search for TypeScript files and verify the definition of EUserWorkspaceRoles and ROLE in the codebase. rg --type ts 'EUserWorkspaceRoles|ROLE'Length of output: 16988
255-262: Dynamic role update on member ID changeThe logic to update the role based on the member ID change ensures that the correct workspace role is set. Verify that
getWorkspaceMemberDetailsreturns accurate role information.Verification successful
Verification of
getWorkspaceMemberDetailsThe
getWorkspaceMemberDetailsfunction is implemented as a method within the workspace member store (workspace-member.store.ts). It is used consistently across various components to retrieve member details. This suggests that it is correctly integrated into the workspace management logic, and its role information retrieval should be accurate if the store is correctly maintained.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the implementation of getWorkspaceMemberDetails function. rg --type typescript 'function getWorkspaceMemberDetails'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of getWorkspaceMemberDetails function in the codebase. rg 'function getWorkspaceMemberDetails'Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for import statements of getWorkspaceMemberDetails in the codebase. rg 'import.*getWorkspaceMemberDetails'Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of getWorkspaceMemberDetails in the codebase to gather more context. rg 'getWorkspaceMemberDetails'Length of output: 2779
apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py (14)
22-22: Importallow_permissionfor enhanced permission managementThe import of
allow_permissionindicates a shift to method-level permission management. Ensure that this decorator is correctly applied to methods requiring specific role access.
122-122: Applyallow_permissiontocreatemethodThe
createmethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Verify that this aligns with the intended access control policies.
144-144: Applyallow_permissiontopartial_updatemethodThe
partial_updatemethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Ensure this change is consistent with other update methods.
210-210: Applyallow_permissiontoretrievemethodThe
retrievemethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.
Line range hint
229-239: Applyallow_permissiontolockandunlockmethodsBoth methods now require "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Ensure this is consistent with the security model across the application.
250-250: Applyallow_permissiontoaccessmethodThe
accessmethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Verify that this aligns with the intended access control policies.
273-273: Applyallow_permissiontolistmethodThe
listmethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles. Ensure this change is consistent with other list methods.
279-279: Applyallow_permissiontoarchivemethodThe
archivemethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Verify that this aligns with the intended access control policies.
307-307: Applyallow_permissiontounarchivemethodThe
unarchivemethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Ensure this change is consistent with other unarchive methods.
337-337: Applyallow_permissiontodestroymethodThe
destroymethod now requires "ADMIN" role and checks for creator status. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.
383-383: Applyallow_permissiontocreatemethod inPageFavoriteViewSetThe
createmethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control policies.
393-393: Applyallow_permissiontodestroymethod inPageFavoriteViewSetThe
destroymethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Verify that this is consistent with other destroy methods.
465-465: Applyallow_permissiontoretrievemethod inPagesDescriptionViewSetThe
retrievemethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles. Ensure this change is consistent with other retrieve methods.
490-490: Applyallow_permissiontopartial_updatemethod inPagesDescriptionViewSetThe
partial_updatemethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.apiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.py (10)
25-25: Importallow_permissionfor enhanced permission managementThe import of
allow_permissionindicates a shift to method-level permission management. Ensure that this decorator is correctly applied to methods requiring specific role access.
79-82: Applyallow_permissiontolistmethod inWorkspaceViewViewSetThe
listmethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.
101-103: Applyallow_permissiontopartial_updatemethod inWorkspaceViewViewSetThe
partial_updatemethod now requires specific roles and checks for creator status. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control policies.
137-139: Applyallow_permissiontodestroymethod inWorkspaceViewViewSetThe
destroymethod now requires "ADMIN" role and checks for creator status. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.
257-259: Applyallow_permissiontolistmethod inWorkspaceViewIssuesViewSetThe
listmethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles. Ensure this change is consistent with other list methods.
419-419: Applyallow_permissiontolistmethod inIssueViewViewSetThe
listmethod now allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.
440-441: Applyallow_permissiontopartial_updatemethod inIssueViewViewSetThe
partial_updatemethod now requires specific roles and checks for creator status. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control policies.
474-475: Applyallow_permissiontodestroymethod inIssueViewViewSetThe
destroymethod now requires "ADMIN" role and checks for creator status. Verify that this provides the intended level of access.
520-521: Applyallow_permissiontocreatemethod inIssueViewFavoriteViewSetThe
createmethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control policies.
531-532: Applyallow_permissiontodestroymethod inIssueViewFavoriteViewSetThe
destroymethod now requires "ADMIN" or "MEMBER" roles. Verify that this is consistent with other destroy methods.apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py (8)
65-68: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
listmethod inInboxViewSet.
73-74: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
perform_createmethod inInboxViewSet.
Line range hint
77-88: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
destroymethod inInboxViewSet, and the logic for handling default inbox deletion is appropriate.
Line range hint
170-211: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
listmethod inInboxIssueViewSet, and the logic for filtering issues based on user roles is well-implemented.
Line range hint
221-322: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
createmethod inInboxIssueViewSet, and the validation logic is appropriate.
Line range hint
324-526: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
partial_updatemethod inInboxIssueViewSet, and the role-checking logic is well-implemented.
Line range hint
519-553: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
retrievemethod inInboxIssueViewSet, with appropriate role and creator checks.
Line range hint
558-577: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
destroymethod inInboxIssueViewSet, with appropriate role and status checks.apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (9)
Line range hint
63-111: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
getmethod inIssueListEndpoint, and the issue retrieval logic is appropriate.
Line range hint
225-334: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
listmethod inIssueViewSet, and the filtering and grouping logic is well-implemented.
Line range hint
340-413: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
createmethod inIssueViewSet, and the issue creation logic is appropriate.
Line range hint
415-486: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
retrievemethod inIssueViewSet, with appropriate role and creator checks.
Line range hint
488-552: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
partial_updatemethod inIssueViewSet, and the update logic is well-implemented.
Line range hint
554-575: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
destroymethod inIssueViewSet, with appropriate role and activity tracking.
Line range hint
577-595: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
patchmethod inIssueUserDisplayPropertyEndpoint, and the update logic is appropriate.
Line range hint
597-604: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
getmethod inIssueUserDisplayPropertyEndpoint, and the retrieval logic is appropriate.
Line range hint
608-629: LGTM!The permission decorator is correctly applied to the
deletemethod inBulkDeleteIssuesEndpoint, and the deletion logic is appropriate.web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list-item.tsx (2)
48-48: LGTM!The import of
useUseris appropriate for implementing role-based access control.
115-117: LGTM!The use of
useUserfor role-based access control in theSidebarProjectsListItemcomponent is well-implemented.apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py (6)
322-322: Permissions forcreatemethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles for creating modules.
434-435: Permissions forretrievemethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles for retrieving module details.
680-680: Permissions forpartial_updatemethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for updating modules.
750-750: Permissions fordestroymethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and checks if the user is the creator for deleting modules.
857-857: Permissions forpatchandgetmethods inModuleUserPropertiesEndpointare broad.The
allow_permissiondecorator allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles, which may be intentional for flexibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control.Also applies to: 880-880
385-386: Permissions forlistmethod include "GUEST" access.The
allow_permissiondecorator allows "GUEST" access, which may be intentional for broader visibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control.web/core/constants/empty-state.ts (1)
493-493: Change inaccessproperty allows guest-level access.The
accessproperty forPROJECT_VIEWnow allowsEUserProjectRoles.GUEST, which may affect visibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control.apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py (10)
605-605: Permissions forcreatemethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for creating cycles.
679-679: Permissions forpartial_updatemethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for updating cycles.
767-767: Permissions forretrievemethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles for retrieving cycle details.
1036-1036: Permissions fordestroymethod are appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and checks if the user is the creator for deleting cycles.
1096-1096: Permissions forpostmethod inCycleDateCheckEndpointare appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for checking cycle dates.
1140-1140: Permissions forcreatemethod inCycleFavoriteViewSetare appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for creating cycle favorites.
1150-1150: Permissions fordestroymethod inCycleFavoriteViewSetare appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for deleting cycle favorites.
1165-1165: Permissions forpostmethod inTransferCycleIssueEndpointare appropriate.The
allow_permissiondecorator correctly restricts access to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles for transferring cycle issues.
318-318: Permissions forlistmethod include "GUEST" access.The
allow_permissiondecorator allows "GUEST" access, which may be intentional for broader visibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control.
1576-1576: Permissions forpatchandgetmethods inCycleUserPropertiesEndpointare broad.The
allow_permissiondecorator allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles, which may be intentional for flexibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended access control.Also applies to: 1599-1599
apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/archive.py (3)
291-291: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forgetmethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator enhances granularity by allowing "ADMIN", "MEMBER", and "VIEWER" roles to access thegetmethod. This change provides more flexible access control compared to the previous class-level permissions.
596-596: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forpostmethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thepostmethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles, ensuring that only authorized users can archive cycles. This aligns with typical access control practices for actions that modify data.
615-615: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator fordeletemethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thedeletemethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles, ensuring that only authorized users can unarchive cycles. This change enhances security by preventing unauthorized modifications.apiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.py (8)
155-157: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forlistmethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles at the "WORKSPACE" level to access thelistmethod. This change provides flexible access control, ensuring appropriate access based on workspace context.
193-195: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forretrievemethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator allows "ADMIN", "MEMBER", "VIEWER", and "GUEST" roles at the "WORKSPACE" level to access theretrievemethod. This change enhances flexibility in access control while maintaining security.
267-267: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forcreatemethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thecreatemethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles at the "WORKSPACE" level. This ensures that only authorized users can create projects, enhancing security.
397-397: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forpartial_updatemethod.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thepartial_updatemethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles at the "WORKSPACE" level. This change ensures that only authorized users can update project details, maintaining data integrity.
479-479: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forpostmethod inProjectArchiveUnarchiveEndpoint.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thepostmethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles, ensuring that only authorized users can archive projects. This enhances security by controlling access to critical operations.
489-489: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator fordeletemethod inProjectArchiveUnarchiveEndpoint.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thedeletemethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles, ensuring that only authorized users can unarchive projects. This change enhances security by preventing unauthorized modifications.
498-498: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator forgetmethod inProjectIdentifierEndpoint.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thegetmethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles at the "WORKSPACE" level. This ensures that only authorized users can access project identifiers, maintaining security.
517-517: Use of@allow_permissiondecorator fordeletemethod inProjectIdentifierEndpoint.The
@allow_permissiondecorator restricts access to thedeletemethod to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles at the "WORKSPACE" level. This change ensures that only authorized users can delete project identifiers, enhancing security.apiserver/plane/app/views/dashboard/base.py (4)
55-62: Conditional filtering indashboard_overview_stats.The introduction of
extra_filtersbased onWorkspaceMemberenhances the relevance of issue statistics by considering user roles within the workspace. This change allows for more accurate data representation.
195-201: Conditional filtering indashboard_assigned_issues.The added filtering logic based on
WorkspaceMemberensures that assigned issues are filtered by the creator when the user has a specific role. This enhances data accuracy and relevance.
446-454: Conditional filtering indashboard_issues_by_state_groups.The
extra_filtersbased onWorkspaceMemberallow for more precise issue counts by state groups, reflecting user roles within the workspace. This change improves the accuracy of the dashboard data.
486-494: Conditional filtering indashboard_issues_by_priority.The introduction of
extra_filtersbased onWorkspaceMemberenhances the relevance of issue counts by priority, considering user roles within the workspace. This change ensures more accurate data representation.
| ProjectMemberPermission, | ||
| ProjectLitePermission, | ||
| ) | ||
| from .base import allow_permission No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import allow_permission.
The import statement for allow_permission is currently unused in this module. Consider removing it or adding it to __all__ if it's intended to be part of the module's public API.
- from .base import allow_permissionCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from .base import allow_permission |
Tools
Ruff
15-15:
.base.allow_permissionimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[notice] 15-15: apiserver/plane/app/permissions/init.py#L15
'.base.allow_permission' imported but unused (F401)
| const { resolvedTheme } = useTheme(); | ||
| // store hooks | ||
| const { membership, signOut, data: currentUser } = useUser(); | ||
| const { membership, signOut, data: currentUser, canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions } = useUser(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance readability by destructuring useUser hook.
The addition of canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions is well-integrated. Consider destructuring the useUser hook to improve readability and maintainability if more properties are added in the future.
- const { membership, signOut, data: currentUser, canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions } = useUser();
+ const {
+ membership,
+ signOut,
+ data: currentUser,
+ canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions
+ } = useUser();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { membership, signOut, data: currentUser, canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions } = useUser(); | |
| const { | |
| membership, | |
| signOut, | |
| data: currentUser, | |
| canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions | |
| } = useUser(); |
| CommentReactionSerializer, | ||
| ) | ||
| from plane.app.permissions import ProjectLitePermission | ||
| from plane.app.permissions import ProjectLitePermission, allow_permission |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused ProjectLitePermission.
The ProjectLitePermission import is no longer used after switching to the allow_permission decorator. Consider removing it to clean up the code.
- from plane.app.permissions import ProjectLitePermission, allow_permission
+ from plane.app.permissions import allow_permissionCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from plane.app.permissions import ProjectLitePermission, allow_permission | |
| from plane.app.permissions import allow_permission |
| if (!canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions && showToast) | ||
| setToast({ | ||
| type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, | ||
| title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.", | ||
| }); | ||
| return canPerformWorkspaceCreateActions; | ||
| return canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions; | ||
| }, | ||
| [canPerformWorkspaceCreateActions] | ||
| [canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor: Simplify Workspace Permission Check Logic
The performWorkspaceCreateActions function checks for workspace member permissions. Consider simplifying the logic by removing the showToast parameter if it's always true.
- const performWorkspaceCreateActions = useCallback(
- (showToast: boolean = true) => {
+ const performWorkspaceCreateActions = useCallback(() => {
if (!canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions)
setToast({
type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.",
});
return canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions;
},
- [canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions]
+ [canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions, setToast]
);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions && showToast) | |
| setToast({ | |
| type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, | |
| title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.", | |
| }); | |
| return canPerformWorkspaceCreateActions; | |
| return canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions; | |
| }, | |
| [canPerformWorkspaceCreateActions] | |
| [canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions] | |
| const performWorkspaceCreateActions = useCallback(() => { | |
| if (!canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions) | |
| setToast({ | |
| type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, | |
| title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.", | |
| }); | |
| return canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions; | |
| }, | |
| [canPerformWorkspaceMemberActions, setToast] |
| if (!canPerformProjectMemberActions && showToast) | ||
| setToast({ | ||
| type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, | ||
| title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.", | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return canPerformProjectCreateActions; | ||
| return canPerformProjectMemberActions; | ||
| }, | ||
| [canPerformProjectCreateActions] | ||
| [canPerformProjectMemberActions] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor: Simplify Permission Check Logic
The performProjectCreateActions function now checks for member-level permissions. Consider simplifying the logic by removing the redundant showToast parameter if it's always true.
- const performProjectCreateActions = useCallback(
- (showToast: boolean = true) => {
+ const performProjectCreateActions = useCallback(() => {
if (!canPerformProjectMemberActions)
setToast({
type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.",
});
return canPerformProjectMemberActions;
},
- [canPerformProjectMemberActions]
+ [canPerformProjectMemberActions, setToast]
);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!canPerformProjectMemberActions && showToast) | |
| setToast({ | |
| type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, | |
| title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.", | |
| }); | |
| return canPerformProjectCreateActions; | |
| return canPerformProjectMemberActions; | |
| }, | |
| [canPerformProjectCreateActions] | |
| [canPerformProjectMemberActions] | |
| const performProjectCreateActions = useCallback(() => { | |
| if (!canPerformProjectMemberActions) | |
| setToast({ | |
| type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, | |
| title: "You don't have permission to perform this action.", | |
| }); | |
| return canPerformProjectMemberActions; | |
| }, [canPerformProjectMemberActions, setToast]); |
| <> | ||
| {currentRole >= item.access && ( | ||
| <Tooltip | ||
| key={item.name} | ||
| className={`pl-[18px] ${isSidebarCollapsed ? "p-0 size-7 justify-center mx-auto" : ""}`} | ||
| isActive={pathname.includes(item.href)} | ||
| isMobile={isMobile} | ||
| tooltipContent={`${project?.name}: ${item.name}`} | ||
| position="right" | ||
| className="ml-2" | ||
| disabled={!isSidebarCollapsed} | ||
| > | ||
| <div className="flex items-center gap-1.5 py-[1px]"> | ||
| <item.Icon | ||
| className={`flex-shrink-0 size-4 ${item.name === "Intake" ? "stroke-1" : "stroke-[1.5]"}`} | ||
| /> | ||
| {!isSidebarCollapsed && <span className="text-xs font-medium">{item.name}</span>} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </SidebarNavItem> | ||
| </Link> | ||
| </Tooltip> | ||
| <Link key={item.name} href={item.href} onClick={handleProjectClick}> | ||
| <SidebarNavItem | ||
| key={item.name} | ||
| className={`pl-[18px] ${isSidebarCollapsed ? "p-0 size-7 justify-center mx-auto" : ""}`} | ||
| isActive={pathname.includes(item.href)} | ||
| > | ||
| <div className="flex items-center gap-1.5 py-[1px]"> | ||
| <item.Icon | ||
| className={`flex-shrink-0 size-4 ${item.name === "Intake" ? "stroke-1" : "stroke-[1.5]"}`} | ||
| /> | ||
| {!isSidebarCollapsed && <span className="text-xs font-medium">{item.name}</span>} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </SidebarNavItem> | ||
| </Link> | ||
| </Tooltip> | ||
| )} | ||
| </> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a key property to iterable elements.
Each child in a list should have a unique "key" prop to help React identify which items have changed, are added, or removed.
- {navigation(workspaceSlug?.toString(), project?.id).map((item) => {
+ {navigation(workspaceSlug?.toString(), project?.id).map((item, index) => {
+ const key = `${item.name}-${index}`;
return (
<>
- {currentRole >= item.access && (
+ {currentRole >= item.access && (
+ <Tooltip key={key}
...
- </Tooltip>
+ </Tooltip>
)}
</>
);
})}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
Biome
[error] 502-528: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
| ProjectEntityPermission, | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| @allow_permission(["ADMIN", "MEMBER"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement key validation in create method.
The TODO comment indicates missing key validation. Ensure that duplicate keys are handled to maintain data integrity.
Would you like assistance in implementing the key validation logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
… into fix-user-role-permission
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (25)
- apiserver/plane/app/permissions/init.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/analytic/base.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/archive.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py (7 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/exporter/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/external/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/activity.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (8 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (12 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/label.py (4 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py (10 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.py (7 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.py (11 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py (17 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.py (11 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py (8 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/webhook/base.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/favorite.py (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/webhook/base.py
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (17)
- apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/analytic/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/archive.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/exporter/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/external/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/activity.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.py
Additional context used
Ruff
apiserver/plane/app/permissions/__init__.py
15-15:
.base.allow_permissionimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
15-15:
.base.ROLEimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
apiserver/plane/app/permissions/__init__.py
[notice] 15-15: apiserver/plane/app/permissions/init.py#L15
'.base.allow_permission' imported but unused (F401)
Additional comments not posted (19)
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/label.py (2)
46-46: Enhance security withallow_permissiondecorator.The addition of the
@allow_permissiondecorator to methods inLabelViewSetandBulkCreateIssueLabelsEndpointimproves security by enforcing role-based access control. Ensure that the roles specified align with the intended access policies.Also applies to: 69-69, 76-76, 82-82
14-14: Verify the impact of permission class changes.The shift from
ProjectMemberPermissiontoProjectBasePermissioninLabelViewSetmight affect access logic. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended permission model and doesn't inadvertently restrict or grant access.apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/favorite.py (1)
17-19: Improve flexibility with method-level permissions.The use of the
@allow_permissiondecorator at the method level enhances flexibility and readability by allowing specific permissions for each action. Verify that the roles and levels specified are consistent with the overall access control strategy.Also applies to: 37-39, 52-54, 67-69, 80-82
apiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.py (2)
235-235: LGTM!The access control for the
destroymethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
31-31: Verify broader access permissions.The
getmethod now allows "VIEWER" role access. Ensure this aligns with the intended permission model for viewing estimate points.apiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.py (6)
197-199: LGTM!The access control for the
mark_readmethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
209-211: LGTM!The access control for the
mark_unreadmethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
221-223: LGTM!The access control for the
archivemethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
233-235: LGTM!The access control for the
unarchivemethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
43-46: Verify broader access permissions.The
listmethod now allows "VIEWER" and "GUEST" roles access. Ensure this aligns with the intended permission model for listing notifications.
176-179: Verify broader access permissions.The
partial_updatemethod now allows "VIEWER" and "GUEST" roles access. Ensure this aligns with the intended permission model for updating notifications.apiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.py (8)
270-270: LGTM!The access control for the
createmethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
400-400: LGTM!The access control for the
partial_updatemethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
482-482: LGTM!The access control for the
postmethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
492-492: LGTM!The access control for the
deletemethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
501-501: LGTM!The access control for the
getmethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
520-520: LGTM!The access control for the
deletemethod is appropriately restricted to "ADMIN" and "MEMBER" roles.
156-159: Verify broader access permissions.The
listmethod now allows "VIEWER" and "GUEST" roles access. Ensure this aligns with the intended permission model for listing projects.Verification successful
Broader access permissions verified.
The
listmethod inProjectViewSetallows broader access as intended by theallow_permissiondecorator. No additional permission modifications are present in the inheritedBaseViewSet.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the broader access for the `list` method aligns with the intended permission model. # Test: Search for all references to `list` in `ProjectViewSet`. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ProjectViewSet { $$$ def list(self, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 457
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for the `list` method in the `ProjectViewSet` class using ast-grep with Python syntax. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class ProjectViewSet:\n $$$\n def list(self, $_):\n $$$\n $$$'Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `ProjectViewSet` class and list its methods using ripgrep. rg -A 10 'class ProjectViewSet' --glob '*.py'Length of output: 877
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `BaseViewSet` class and its methods to check for a `list` method. rg -A 10 'class BaseViewSet' --glob '*.py'Length of output: 1259
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for decorators applied to methods in `BaseViewSet` to check for permission-related decorators. rg -A 5 '@' apiserver/plane/app/views/base.pyLength of output: 1146
195-198: Verify broader access permissions.The
retrievemethod now allows "VIEWER" and "GUEST" roles access. Ensure this aligns with the intended permission model for retrieving projects.
| ProjectEntityPermission, | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| @allow_permission([ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement key validation in create method.
The TODO comment indicates missing key validation. Ensure that duplicate keys are handled to maintain data integrity.
Would you like assistance in implementing the key validation logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
| serializer = EstimatePointSerializer(estimate_point).data | ||
| return Response(serializer, status=status.HTTP_200_OK) | ||
|
|
||
| @allow_permission([ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement key validation in partial_update method.
The TODO comment indicates missing key validation. Ensure that updates do not introduce duplicate keys.
Would you like assistance in implementing the key validation logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
| ProjectMemberPermission, | ||
| ProjectLitePermission, | ||
| ) | ||
| from .base import allow_permission, ROLE No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused imports allow_permission and ROLE.
The imports allow_permission and ROLE from .base are currently unused in this module. Consider removing them or adding them to __all__ if they're intended to be part of the module's public API.
- from .base import allow_permission, ROLECommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from .base import allow_permission, ROLE |
Tools
Ruff
15-15:
.base.allow_permissionimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
15-15:
.base.ROLEimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[notice] 15-15: apiserver/plane/app/permissions/init.py#L15
'.base.allow_permission' imported but unused (F401)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py (7 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py (13 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (6 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (12 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py (5 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py (10 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.py (6 hunks)
- web/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list-item.tsx (6 hunks)
- web/core/hooks/use-favorite-item-details.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/issue.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py
- apiserver/plane/app/views/module/issue.py
- web/core/components/command-palette/command-palette.tsx
- web/core/hooks/use-favorite-item-details.tsx
Additional context used
Ruff
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py
25-25: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
47-47: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
47-47: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
Biome
web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list-item.tsx
[error] 504-530: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
Additional comments not posted (10)
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py (6)
25-25: Ensureallow_permissionandROLEare defined.The
allow_permissiondecorator andROLEconstants must be correctly defined and imported for this code to function as expected.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
allow_permissionandROLEare correctly defined and imported.The
allow_permissiondecorator andROLEconstants are properly defined and imported in the codebase, ensuring that the permissions are managed as expected in thepostmethod. No further issues were found related to these components.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of `allow_permission` and `ROLE`. # Test: Search for `allow_permission` and `ROLE` definitions. Expect: Definitions should exist. rg --type python --fixed-strings 'allow_permission' rg --type python --fixed-strings 'ROLE'Length of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of `allow_permission` and `ROLE`. # Test: Search for `allow_permission` and `ROLE` definitions. Expect: Definitions should exist. rg --type py --fixed-strings 'allow_permission' rg --type py --fixed-strings 'ROLE'Length of output: 30524
Tools
Ruff
25-25: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
Line range hint
47-60:
LGTM! Verify the deletion logic.The
deletemethod logic is correct, but ensure that the deletion ofissue_attachmentand itsassetis handled properly.Verify that the deletion process is correctly implemented and doesn't leave orphaned assets.
Verification successful
Deletion Logic Verified: No Orphaned Assets
The deletion logic for
issue_attachmentand itsassetis correctly implemented in bothapiserver/plane/api/views/issue.pyandapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py. Theassetis deleted before theissue_attachment, ensuring no orphaned assets remain.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `issue_attachment` deletion logic. # Test: Search for `issue_attachment` deletion logic. Expect: Proper handling of asset deletion. rg --type python --context 5 'issue_attachment.delete'Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `issue_attachment` deletion logic. # Test: Search for `issue_attachment` deletion logic. Expect: Proper handling of asset deletion. rg --type py --context 5 'issue_attachment.delete'Length of output: 1956
Tools
Ruff
47-47: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
47-47: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Ensureallow_permissiondecorator is correctly applied.The
allow_permissiondecorator should be correctly applied to manage access for thegetmethod.Verification successful
allow_permissionDecorator Correctly AppliedThe
allow_permissiondecorator is correctly applied to thegetmethod inapiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.py, managing permissions for roles ADMIN, MEMBER, GUEST, and VIEWER. No further issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `allow_permission` decorator application for the `get` method. # Test: Search for `allow_permission` usage in the `get` method. Expect: Correct application. rg --type python --fixed-strings 'allow_permission'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `allow_permission` decorator application for the `get` method. # Test: Search for `allow_permission` usage in the codebase. Expect: Correct application. rg 'allow_permission'Length of output: 14267
Tools
Ruff
66-66: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
47-47: Ensureallow_permissiondecorator is correctly configured.The
allow_permissiondecorator usescreator=Trueandmodel=IssueAttachment. Ensure these configurations are supported and correctly implemented.Verification successful
allow_permissionDecorator Configuration VerifiedThe
allow_permissiondecorator is correctly configured to supportcreator=Trueandmodel=IssueAttachment. The function definition inapiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.pyconfirms support for these parameters. No issues found with the current implementation.
apiserver/plane/app/permissions/base.py: Function definition supportscreatorandmodelparameters.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `allow_permission` decorator supports `creator=True` and `model=IssueAttachment`. # Test: Search for `allow_permission` usage with `creator` and `model` arguments. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type python --fixed-strings 'allow_permission'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `allow_permission` decorator supports `creator=True` and `model=IssueAttachment`. # Test: Search for `allow_permission` usage with `creator` and `model` arguments. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type py --fixed-strings 'allow_permission'Length of output: 14293
Tools
Ruff
47-47: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
47-47: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
Line range hint
66-72:
LGTM! Verify the query logic.The
getmethod logic is correct, but ensure that the query forissue_attachmentsis efficient and returns expected results.Verify that the query correctly filters
issue_attachmentsbased onissue_id,workspace__slug, andproject_id.Verification successful
Query Logic Verified Successfully
The query logic forissue_attachmentsin thegetmethod correctly filters based onissue_id,workspace__slug, andproject_id. The logic is efficient and returns the expected results.
- File:
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/attachment.pyScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `issue_attachments` query logic. # Test: Search for `issue_attachments` query logic. Expect: Correct filtering based on `issue_id`, `workspace__slug`, and `project_id`. rg --type python --context 5 'IssueAttachment.objects.filter'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `issue_attachments` query logic. # Test: Search for `issue_attachments` query logic. Expect: Correct filtering based on `issue_id`, `workspace__slug`, and `project_id`. rg --type py --context 5 'IssueAttachment.objects.filter'Length of output: 18681
Tools
Ruff
66-66: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
66-66: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
Line range hint
25-41:
LGTM! Verify the serializer logic.The
postmethod logic is correct, but ensure that theIssueAttachmentSerializerhandles project and issue IDs as expected.Verify that the serializer correctly processes the
project_idandissue_id.Tools
Ruff
25-25: Undefined name
allow_permission(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
25-25: Undefined name
ROLE(F821)
web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/projects-list-item.tsx (4)
48-48: LGTM! TheuseUserhook is appropriately imported.The import of
useUseraligns with the PR objectives to manage user roles.
73-103: LGTM! Navigation items have appropriate access control.The
accessproperty for navigation items is correctly applied to manage role-based visibility.
Line range hint
390-425:
LGTM! Conditional rendering of menu items is correctly implemented.The render logic for menu items based on user roles is correctly applied.
504-530: Add a key property to iterable elements.Each child in a list should have a unique "key" prop to help React identify which items have changed, are added, or removed.
Tools
Biome
[error] 504-530: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
5 participants
Changes:
This PR includes following changes:
Reference:
[WEB-1506] [WEB-2126]
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes