Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on enhancing permission handling across various components in the application. Modifications include the standardization of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
anmolsinghbhatia
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/reaction.py (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/cycles/delete-modal.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/list-group.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/roots/project-root.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/labels/project-setting-label-group.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/labels/project-setting-label-list.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/modules/delete-module-modal.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/leave-project-modal.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/member-list-item.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/settings/member-columns.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/workspace/settings/member-columns.tsx (0 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- web/core/components/workspace/settings/member-columns.tsx
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/reaction.py
Additional comments not posted (15)
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/roots/project-root.tsx (3)
9-10: LGTM!The imports are relevant and necessary for the permission-based functionality introduced in this file.
15-25: LGTM!The
canEditPropertiesBasedOnProjectfunction correctly encapsulates the permission check logic based on the user's role within a specific workspace and project. This function can be reused in other parts of the component to conditionally render features based on user permissions.
27-32: LGTM!Passing the
canEditPropertiesBasedOnProjectfunction as a prop to theBaseListRootcomponent is a good way to share the permission check logic with child components. This allows the child component to use this function to conditionally render features based on user permissions without duplicating the code.web/core/components/modules/delete-module-modal.tsx (1)
59-59: LGTM!The updated error message for permission-related issues provides a more generalized and user-friendly message. The logic for identifying permission errors and selecting the appropriate error message remains correct.
web/core/components/cycles/delete-modal.tsx (1)
57-57: LGTM! The updated error message improves user communication.The change from a specific error message mentioning "admin or owner" to a more generic "You don't have the required permissions" aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing user experience.
While the new message may not provide the same level of detail about the roles required, it still effectively communicates the lack of necessary permissions to the user. This can lead to a clearer understanding of the error context.
web/core/components/project/member-list-item.tsx (1)
41-41: Improved user experience with immediate navigation.The addition of the immediate navigation action using
router.push(/${workspaceSlug}/projects)before calling theleaveProjectfunction enhances the user experience by providing instant feedback and navigation when the user initiates the leave action.This change ensures that the user is redirected to the project list page as soon as they click the leave button, rather than waiting for the asynchronous
leaveProjectoperation to complete. It streamlines the flow and eliminates potential delays in navigation.The removal of the subsequent navigation call within the
.then()block further optimizes the code by avoiding redundant navigation actions.web/core/components/labels/project-setting-label-list.tsx (2)
114-114: LGTM!The addition of the
isEditableprop to theProjectSettingLabelGroupcomponent enhances the flexibility of the label components by enabling conditional rendering or behavior based on the editability state. This change aligns with the PR objective of adjusting permissions for project labels to ensure appropriate access control.
127-127: LGTM!The addition of the
isEditableprop to theProjectSettingLabelItemcomponent enhances the flexibility of the label components by enabling conditional rendering or behavior based on the editability state. This change aligns with the PR objective of adjusting permissions for project labels to ensure appropriate access control.web/core/components/labels/project-setting-label-group.tsx (2)
28-28: LGTM!The new optional
isEditableproperty is correctly defined in thePropstype. This will allow the component to determine if it should render in an editable state.
32-41: Verify the handling ofisEditableprop in the child component.The
isEditableproperty is correctly destructured frompropsand passed down to theProjectSettingLabelItemchild component. This allows the child component to adjust its behavior based on the editability of the label group.However, please ensure that the
ProjectSettingLabelItemcomponent handles theisEditableprop correctly to avoid any unexpected behavior.Run the following script to verify the prop usage in
ProjectSettingLabelItem:Also applies to: 136-136
web/core/components/project/settings/member-columns.tsx (2)
100-103: LGTM! The changes enhance role management granularity.The introduction of
isProjectAdminOrGuestandisWorkspaceMembervariables allows for distinguishing between project-level and workspace-level roles. This granularity potentially improves access control and permission handling in the application.The
isProjectAdminOrGuestvariable retains the original check for admin or guest role in the project, while theisWorkspaceMembervariable introduces a new check for the member role in the workspace. Retrieving the workspace member role usinggetWorkspaceMemberDetailsand defaulting to guest if not found ensures a fail-safe behavior.Overall, these changes contribute to more fine-grained role management in the application.
104-104: Looks good! The change aligns with the enhanced role management granularity.The update to the
isRoleNonEditablecondition incorporates the newisWorkspaceMembercheck, ensuring that users who are project admins or guests but not workspace members cannot edit their roles. This change aligns with the enhanced role management granularity introduced in the previous code segment.The previous condition only checked if the user was the current user, but the updated condition adds a new check: if the user is a project admin or guest and not a workspace member, their role is also non-editable.
This change contributes to a more consistent and secure handling of user roles in the application.
web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/list-group.tsx (3)
7-7: LGTM!The import statement for the
useParamshook fromnext/navigationis valid and correctly added.
94-94: LGTM!The
useParamshook is correctly used to extract theprojectIdfrom the route parameters. This allows the component to access project-specific data based on the current route.
221-222: Excellent work on enhancing the drag-and-drop permissions!The changes made to the
isDragAllowedvariable ensure that the drag-and-drop functionality within the list group is properly controlled based on the user's permission to edit properties for the specific project.By linking the drag-and-drop behavior to the
canEditPropertiesfunction and theprojectId, you have effectively enhanced the access control and security of this feature. Only users with the appropriate permissions will be able to perform drag operations within the list group.This is a great improvement in terms of granular permission management and preventing unauthorized modifications to the list group.
| if (data) { | ||
| if (data.projectName === project?.name) { | ||
| if (data.confirmLeave === "Leave Project") { | ||
| router.push(`/${workspaceSlug}/projects`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improved user experience, but handle failure scenario gracefully.
The change enhances the user experience by providing immediate feedback through navigation to the projects page, indicating that the leave action is being processed.
However, there is a potential risk of inconsistency if the leaveProject function fails after the user is redirected. The user might be on the projects page while still being a member of the project they intended to leave.
Consider handling the failure scenario gracefully:
- Display an error message on the projects page if the
leaveProjectfunction fails. - Provide an option to retry leaving the project.
- Ensure that the user's membership status is accurately reflected on the projects page.
| router.push(`/${workspaceSlug}/projects`); | ||
| }) | ||
| .catch((err) => | ||
| setToast({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't he be taken to the previous page in case of error?
5 participants
Changes:
This PR includes following changes:
Reference:
[WEB-2467]
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
isEditable) to components, allowing for conditional rendering based on editability.Improvements
Bug Fixes