-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
[WEB-2568] chore: minor improvements for issue activity component. #5725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | ||
| export * from "./issue-identifier"; | ||
| export * from "./issue-properties-activity"; | ||
| export * from "./issue-type-switcher"; | ||
| export * from "./issue-type-activity"; |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
| "use client"; | ||
|
|
||
| import { FC } from "react"; | ||
| import { observer } from "mobx-react"; | ||
|
|
||
| export type TIssueTypeActivity = { activityId: string; showIssue?: boolean; ends: "top" | "bottom" | undefined }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const IssueTypeActivity: FC<TIssueTypeActivity> = observer(() => <></>); | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | ||
| export * from "./issue-identifier"; | ||
| export * from "./issue-properties-activity"; | ||
| export * from "./issue-type-switcher"; | ||
| export * from "./issue-type-activity"; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification IssueTypeActivity Component is Currently Incomplete The
Please ensure that 🔗 Analysis chainLGTM! Additional context would be helpful. The new export is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives for minor improvements to the issue activity component. The syntax is consistent with other exports in this file. To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, could you provide more information about the
This context will help in understanding the full impact of this change. You can run the following script to view the contents of the 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: View contents of the issue-type-activity file
# Test: Display the contents of the issue-type-activity.ts file
cat $(fd -t f "issue-type-activity.ts" | head -n 1)
Length of output: 393 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Find usages of IssueTypeActivity component in the codebase
rg 'IssueTypeActivity' --type=typescript
Length of output: 75 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Find usages of IssueTypeActivity component in the codebase
rg 'IssueTypeActivity' --glob '**/*.{ts,tsx}'
Length of output: 673 |
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| export * from "ce/components/issues/issue-details"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
IssueTypeActivity is used but has an empty implementation.
The
IssueTypeActivitycomponent is currently rendered inactivity-list.tsxbut returns an empty fragment. This may lead to missing functionality or unexpected UI behavior.web/ce/components/issues/issue-details/issue-type-activity.tsxweb/core/components/issues/issue-detail/issue-activity/activity/activity-list.tsxConsider implementing the component's functionality or removing it if it's not required.
🔗 Analysis chain
Component structure is correct, but implementation is missing.
The
IssueTypeActivitycomponent is correctly declared as a functional component with proper typing and MobX observer wrapper. However, the component currently renders an empty fragment.Is this intentional, or is the implementation missing? If it's a work in progress, consider adding a TODO comment to indicate what needs to be implemented.
To verify if this component is used elsewhere in the codebase, run the following script:
This will help determine if the component is already being used, which might indicate that the implementation is indeed missing and should be prioritized.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 86
Script:
Length of output: 71
Script:
Length of output: 679