Skip to content

Comments

fix: export button overlap issue#6149

Merged
pushya22 merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-custom-analytics-overlap
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

fix: export button overlap issue#6149
pushya22 merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-custom-analytics-overlap

Conversation

@gakshita
Copy link
Collaborator

@gakshita gakshita commented Dec 4, 2024

Summary

This PR fixes the overlap issue with export btn on custom analytics screen

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced functionality to control the visibility of a floating chat bot.
    • Implemented lifecycle management for the chat bot in the Custom Analytics component.
  • Bug Fixes

    • None
  • Documentation

    • None
  • Refactor

    • None
  • Style

    • None
  • Tests

    • None
  • Chores

    • None
  • Revert

    • None

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces two new functions, hideFloatingBot and showFloatingBot, in the web/ce/helpers/pi-chat.helper.ts file, which are intended to control the visibility of a floating chat bot interface. Additionally, modifications are made to the CustomAnalytics component in custom-analytics.tsx, where these functions are imported and utilized within a useEffect hook to manage the chat bot's visibility during the component's lifecycle.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/ce/helpers/pi-chat.helper.ts Added functions: hideFloatingBot and showFloatingBot (empty implementations).
web/core/components/analytics/custom-analytics/custom-analytics.tsx Imported hideFloatingBot and showFloatingBot; integrated visibility control in useEffect.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🐛bug, 🌐frontend

Suggested reviewers

  • SatishGandham
  • sriramveeraghanta

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A floating bot hops in to say,
"Hide me now, then show me bright,
With just a call, I'll take flight!"
So let the chat begin to flow,
As we code and laugh, our spirits glow! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6ab853 and d9c7cc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/ce/helpers/pi-chat.helper.ts (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/analytics/custom-analytics/custom-analytics.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/core/components/analytics/custom-analytics/custom-analytics.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-90: Verify the export button overlap resolution

The changes focus on floating bot visibility but don't directly address the export button overlap issue mentioned in the PR description. Please verify if hiding the floating bot actually resolves the export button overlap.

Let's check for any export button related styles or positioning:

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 54-54: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)

Comment on lines +1 to +3
export const hideFloatingBot = () => {};

export const showFloatingBot = () => {};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Implementation required for hideFloatingBot and showFloatingBot functions

The functions are currently empty, which could lead to runtime issues. Consider implementing the actual functionality to control the floating bot visibility.

Consider adding TypeScript types and documentation:

-export const hideFloatingBot = () => {};
-
-export const showFloatingBot = () => {};
+/**
+ * Hides the floating chat bot interface
+ * @returns void
+ */
+export const hideFloatingBot = (): void => {
+  const botElement = document.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.floating-bot');
+  if (botElement) botElement.style.display = 'none';
+};
+
+/**
+ * Shows the floating chat bot interface
+ * @returns void
+ */
+export const showFloatingBot = (): void => {
+  const botElement = document.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.floating-bot');
+  if (botElement) botElement.style.display = 'block';
+};

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +56 to +61
useEffect(() => {
hideFloatingBot();
return () => {
showFloatingBot();
};
}, []);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review the useEffect dependencies and error handling

The useEffect hook might run unnecessarily without dependencies. Also, consider adding error handling for the bot visibility functions.

Consider this improvement:

  useEffect(() => {
-   hideFloatingBot();
+   try {
+     hideFloatingBot();
+   } catch (error) {
+     console.error('Failed to hide floating bot:', error);
+   }
    return () => {
-     showFloatingBot();
+     try {
+       showFloatingBot();
+     } catch (error) {
+       console.error('Failed to show floating bot:', error);
+     }
    };
-  }, []);
+  }, []); // Empty deps array is fine as we only want this to run once
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
hideFloatingBot();
return () => {
showFloatingBot();
};
}, []);
useEffect(() => {
try {
hideFloatingBot();
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to hide floating bot:', error);
}
return () => {
try {
showFloatingBot();
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to show floating bot:', error);
}
};
}, []); // Empty deps array is fine as we only want this to run once

@pushya22 pushya22 changed the title fix: export btn overlap issue fix: export button overlap issue Dec 4, 2024
@pushya22 pushya22 merged commit f02a2b0 into preview Dec 4, 2024
@pushya22 pushya22 deleted the fix-custom-analytics-overlap branch December 4, 2024 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants