Conversation
sangeethailango
requested review from
NarayanBavisetti and
sriramveeraghanta
|
sangeetha seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements for managing quick links within workspaces. It adds a new serializer, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/quick_link.py (1)
29-29: Shorten line length.A static analysis tool indicates line length exceeds 88 characters. Consider breaking it into multiple lines or using local variables to make it more readable and comply with style guides.
- serializer = WorkspaceUserLinkSerializer(quick_link, data=request.data, partial=True) + serializer = WorkspaceUserLinkSerializer( + quick_link, data=request.data, partial=True + )🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
29-29: Line too long (93 > 88)
(E501)
apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py (2)
217-218: Use a more descriptive comment.While "quick link" is clear, it can be more descriptive for future maintainers, e.g., "# Endpoints for managing quick links within a workspace".
219-223: Remove trailing space fromname="workspace-quick-links "string.There is a trailing space in the
nameargument's string literal, which can accidentally cause inconsistencies when referencing this path name in other parts of the code.- name="workspace-quick-links " + name="workspace-quick-links"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/__init__.py(1 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/serializers/workspace.py(2 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py(2 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/views/__init__.py(1 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/quick_link.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/quick_link.py
29-29: Line too long (93 > 88)
(E501)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/workspace.py (1)
110-114: Serializer fields look consistent.
The WorkspaceUserLinkSerializer includes fields = "__all__", but marks workspace and owner as read-only. This is consistent with many usage patterns to avoid accidental overrides. No issues found here.
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/__init__.py (1)
22-22: LGTM.
Importing WorkspaceUserLinkSerializer here neatly centralizes your exports. No changes needed.
apiserver/plane/app/views/__init__.py (1)
75-75: Approved import addition.
Adding QuickLinkViewSet is consistent with the new feature. This arrangement keeps workspace-related views logically grouped.
apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py (1)
224-228: Verify whether a GET endpoint is needed to retrieve a single quick link.
Currently, only patch and delete are exposed for single quick links. If retrieving an individual quick link by ID is desired, consider adding a retrieve action. Otherwise, confirm that you do not need to retrieve a single quick link in your use case.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the quick link functionality to better understand the use case.
Let me try a different approach to understand the quick link functionality better.
A GET endpoint for single quick link retrieval is not necessary
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The workspace quick links are simple entities with basic fields (title, url, metadata)
- All quick links for a workspace can be retrieved using the list endpoint (
GET /workspaces/<slug>/quick-links/) - The current CRUD operations (list all, create, update, delete) are sufficient for the use case
- There's no evidence of a need for individual quick link retrieval in the frontend code
Since quick links are lightweight resources and can be efficiently retrieved through the list endpoint, adding a separate retrieve endpoint would be unnecessary complexity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify usage of QuickLinkViewSet across the codebase to confirm if GET retrieval by pk is needed.
rg -A 5 --heading $'QuickLinkViewSet'
Length of output: 853
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the model and serializer implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class WorkspaceUserLink'
# Check frontend API calls
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'quick-link.*pk'
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the model definition
rg -A 10 "class WorkspaceUserLink"
# Check frontend API calls related to quick links
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' -A 5 "quick-link"
# Check serializer implementation
rg -A 10 "class WorkspaceUserLinkSerializer"
Length of output: 1718
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/workspace.py (1)
120-125: Consider more flexible URL handlingThe current implementation automatically prepends "http://" to URLs without a protocol. This might not always be the desired behavior:
- Some URLs might intentionally use other protocols
- Internal URLs might not need a protocol
Consider this more flexible approach:
def to_internal_value(self, data): url = data.get("url", "") - if url and not url.startswith(("http://", "https://")): + if url and not any(url.startswith(p) for p in ["http://", "https://", "/"]): data["url"] = "http://" + url return super().to_internal_value(data)apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py (1)
218-223: Fix URL pattern name formattingThere's an extra space in the URL pattern name.
Apply this fix:
path( "workspaces/<str:slug>/quick-links/", QuickLinkViewSet.as_view({"get": "list", "post": "create"}), - name="workspace-quick-links " + name="workspace-quick-links" ),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/workspace.py(2 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/workspace.py (2)
14-14: LGTM: Import statements are properly organized
The new imports are correctly placed and necessary for URL validation functionality.
Also applies to: 18-20
114-118: LGTM: Serializer configuration is properly structured
The serializer is correctly configured with appropriate read-only fields for workspace and owner.
apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py (2)
30-30: LGTM: ViewSet import is properly placed
The QuickLinkViewSet import is correctly added to the existing imports.
219-228: Verify ViewSet implementation completeness
The URL patterns suggest CRUD operations (list, create, partial_update, destroy), but we should verify that the ViewSet properly implements all these methods.
Let's check the ViewSet implementation:
✅ Verification successful
ViewSet implementation is complete and correct
The implementation is properly structured and complete. Here's why:
- QuickLinkViewSet inherits from BaseViewSet which extends Django's ModelViewSet
- ModelViewSet automatically provides the standard list and destroy methods
- The custom implementations for create and partial_update methods are properly defined with appropriate permissions and error handling
- The base class provides proper queryset handling through get_queryset method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify QuickLinkViewSet implementation completeness
# Search for QuickLinkViewSet class definition and its methods
ast-grep --pattern $'class QuickLinkViewSet {
$$$
list($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
create($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
partial_update($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
destroy($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the QuickLinkViewSet implementation
# First, let's find the file containing QuickLinkViewSet
rg "class QuickLinkViewSet" -l
# Then let's see the full implementation with context
rg "class QuickLinkViewSet" -A 50
Length of output: 2452
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the BaseViewSet to see if it provides the list and destroy methods
rg "class BaseViewSet" -A 20
# Also check if there are any other list/destroy method implementations in the quick_link.py file
rg "def (list|destroy)" apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/quick_link.py
Length of output: 2701
| def validate_url(self, value): | ||
| url_validator = URLValidator() | ||
| try: | ||
| url_validator(value) | ||
| except ValidationError: | ||
| raise serializers.ValidationError({"error": "Invalid URL format."}) | ||
|
|
||
| return value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance URL validation error handling
The current URL validation has two issues:
- Error message structure is inconsistent with DRF's standard format
- Validation could be more comprehensive
Consider this enhanced implementation:
def validate_url(self, value):
url_validator = URLValidator()
try:
url_validator(value)
except ValidationError:
- raise serializers.ValidationError({"error": "Invalid URL format."})
+ raise serializers.ValidationError("Invalid URL format.")
+ # Additional validation for security
+ if value.startswith("http://"):
+ raise serializers.ValidationError(
+ "For security reasons, only HTTPS URLs are allowed."
+ )
+
return value📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def validate_url(self, value): | |
| url_validator = URLValidator() | |
| try: | |
| url_validator(value) | |
| except ValidationError: | |
| raise serializers.ValidationError({"error": "Invalid URL format."}) | |
| return value | |
| def validate_url(self, value): | |
| url_validator = URLValidator() | |
| try: | |
| url_validator(value) | |
| except ValidationError: | |
| raise serializers.ValidationError("Invalid URL format.") | |
| # Additional validation for security | |
| if value.startswith("http://"): | |
| raise serializers.ValidationError( | |
| "For security reasons, only HTTPS URLs are allowed." | |
| ) | |
| return value |
2 participants
Description
Type of Change
Screenshots and Media (if applicable)
Test Scenarios
References
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation