Skip to content

Comments

[WEB-3375] fix: project cover image#6602

Merged
sriramveeraghanta merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
fix-project-cover-image
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

[WEB-3375] fix: project cover image#6602
sriramveeraghanta merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
fix-project-cover-image

Conversation

@anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Feb 13, 2025

Description

This PR fixes project cover image bug.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix

References

[WEB-3375]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced the project details display to ensure a cover image is always shown by falling back to a default image when none is provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the cover image handling in the ProjectDetailsForm component. Instead of returning an empty string when no cover image is provided, the implementation now supplies a default Unsplash image URL. No changes were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
web/.../form.tsx Modified cover image handling in ProjectDetailsForm by replacing an empty string fallback with a default Unsplash image URL if unavailable.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🐛bug

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham

Poem

I'm a rabbit with digital flair,
Hopping through code with gentle care.
A fallback image now fills the space,
Bringing a smile to every interface.
With each hop, fixed pixels gleam—
A little code dance in a techie dream!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6e4c70 and 63b5dd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/project/form.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • web/core/components/project/form.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta merged commit 39ecfbe into preview Feb 13, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta deleted the fix-project-cover-image branch February 13, 2025 18:04
lifeiscontent pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
* fix: project cover image

* chore: code refactor
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants