Skip to content

Fix: padding for editor#6712

Merged
sriramveeraghanta merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-workitem_description_padding
Mar 6, 2025
Merged

Fix: padding for editor#6712
sriramveeraghanta merged 1 commit intopreviewfrom
fix-workitem_description_padding

Conversation

@iam-vipin
Copy link
Member

@iam-vipin iam-vipin commented Mar 6, 2025

Description

Clicking at the bottom of the editor did not place the new node as expected due to the lack of padding.

Fix

  • Added padding at the bottom to ensure proper node placement.

Screenshots and Media (if applicable)

Screen.Recording.2025-03-06.at.2.45.37.PM.mov

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Adjusted the layout of the rich text editor by adding extra bottom padding for improved spacing.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the layout of the rich text editor component by modifying the CSS classes passed to the container element. Specifically, the containerClassName prop is updated from cn("relative pl-3", containerClassName) to cn("relative pl-3 pb-3", containerClassName) to include additional bottom padding. No changes were made to the component's public API.

Changes

File Change Summary
web/core/components/editor/.../rich-text-editor.tsx Updated containerClassName by adding the pb-3 class to include bottom padding within the RichTextEditor component.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🎨UI / UX, ✍️editor

Suggested reviewers

  • SatishGandham
  • aaryan610

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a coding flair,
Hopping through lines with a joyful air.
A padding change makes layouts bright,
Adding space to feed our design insight!
Carrots and code, both are a delight!
🥕🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a40e44c and 89e2a1f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/rich-text-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/rich-text-editor.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@iam-vipin iam-vipin marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2025 09:19
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta merged commit 4958be7 into preview Mar 6, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta deleted the fix-workitem_description_padding branch March 6, 2025 10:08
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta added this to the v0.25.2 milestone Mar 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants