Skip to content

Blog post on faster joins#1485

Merged
richvdh merged 9 commits into
masterfrom
rav/faster_joins_blog
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Blog post on faster joins#1485
richvdh merged 9 commits into
masterfrom
rav/faster_joins_blog

Conversation

@richvdh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@richvdh richvdh commented Oct 5, 2022

@richvdh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

richvdh commented Oct 5, 2022

probably we want to wait for Synapse 1.69final to be out before publishing this?

Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
richvdh and others added 2 commits October 5, 2022 15:50
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <olivier@librepush.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Morgan <1342360+anoadragon453@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-04-faster-joins.mdx Outdated
Comment thread gatsby/content/blog/2022/10/2022-10-18-faster-joins.mdx
faster_joins: True
```

With that, any future remote room joins (or at least those going via `matrix.org`) will use the new faster joins algorithm. Please let us know how you get on, and file Github issues for any problems you might have!
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we're going to need a checkbox on the issue template for "are you using faster joins?"

@richvdh richvdh merged commit a970c68 into master Oct 18, 2022
@richvdh richvdh deleted the rav/faster_joins_blog branch October 18, 2022 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants