This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Return early on /sync code paths if a '*' filter is used#1640
Merged
Conversation
This is currently very conservative in that it only does this if there is no `since` token. This limits the risk to clients likely to be doing one-off syncs (like bridges), but does mean that normal human clients won't benefit from the time savings here. If the savings are large enough, I would consider generalising this to just check the filter.
Member
|
lgtm |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently checks for
*filters on:This is currently very conservative in that it only does this if there is no
sincetoken. This limits the risk to clients likely to be doing one-offsyncs (like bridges), but does mean that normal human clients won't benefit
from the time savings here. If the savings are large enough, I would consider
generalising this to just check the filter.