Skip to content

Conversation

@tyrielv
Copy link
Contributor

@tyrielv tyrielv commented Sep 24, 2025

In some environments "gvfs" may not be properly resolved by the shell when running the background prefetch process, so this change uses the current process path instead.

If the background prefetch process fails to start, the error is now displayed to the user with remediation steps and clone continues to the next step.

In some environments "gvfs" may not be properly resolved by the shell
when running the background prefetch process, so this change uses the
current process path instead.

If the background prefetch process fails to start, the error is now
displayed to the user with remediation steps and clone continues to the
next step.
@tyrielv tyrielv force-pushed the user/tyvella/gvfsrecurse branch from fe08af1 to 96cbde2 Compare September 24, 2025 16:17
@huskydawg huskydawg self-requested a review September 24, 2025 17:01
@huskydawg
Copy link
Member

looks good

Copy link
Member

@huskydawg huskydawg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@tyrielv tyrielv merged commit 4a61f32 into microsoft:master Oct 6, 2025
93 of 94 checks passed
@tyrielv tyrielv deleted the user/tyvella/gvfsrecurse branch October 6, 2025 15:04
@mjcheetham mjcheetham mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants