fix(engine): add from None to re-raised exception (B904)#24
Merged
Conversation
…(B904) Ruff B904 requires explicit exception chaining when raising inside an except block. Added `from None` since we intentionally replace the ValueError/TypeError with a more descriptive ExecutionError. Also applied ruff auto-formatting fixes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
workflow.pythat was failing CIfrom Nonetoraise ExecutionError(...)inside anexcept (ValueError, TypeError)clause to make exception chaining explicitTest plan
make lintpassesmake typecheckpassesmake testpasses (1629 tests, 0 failures)🤖 Generated with Claude Code