-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
Add __createBinding and __setModuleDefault helpers #89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cc @rbuckton do you have any feedback here, too? |
tslib.js
Outdated
| exporter("__classPrivateFieldGet", __classPrivateFieldGet); | ||
| exporter("__classPrivateFieldSet", __classPrivateFieldSet); | ||
| exporter("__createBinding", __createBinding); | ||
| exporter("__setModuleDefault", __setModuleDefault) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this actually needs to be exposed, since no TypeScript code will emit tslib_1.__setModuleDefault (since its only used by __importStar).
… directly referenced
ExE-Boss
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You forgot to remove __setModuleDefault from one more location.
| var __classPrivateFieldGet; | ||
| var __classPrivateFieldSet; | ||
| var __createBinding; | ||
| var __setModuleDefault; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| var __setModuleDefault; |
| o[k2] = m[k]; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| __setModuleDefault = Object.create ? (function(o, v) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| __setModuleDefault = Object.create ? (function(o, v) { | |
| var __setModuleDefault = Object.create ? (function(o, v) { |
| export declare function __importDefault<T>(mod: T): T | { default: T }; | ||
| export declare function __classPrivateFieldGet<T extends object, V>(receiver: T, privateMap: WeakMap<T, V>): V; | ||
| export declare function __classPrivateFieldSet<T extends object, V>(receiver: T, privateMap: WeakMap<T, V>, value: V): V; | ||
| export declare function __createBinding(t: any, mod: any, k: string, k2?: string): void; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably be:
| export declare function __createBinding(t: any, mod: any, k: string, k2?: string): void; | |
| export declare function __createBinding(t: object, mod: object, k: string, k2?: string): void; |
or
| export declare function __createBinding(t: any, mod: any, k: string, k2?: string): void; | |
| export declare function __createBinding(t: object, mod: object, k: PropertyKey, k2?: PropertyKey): void; |
|
|
||
| export function __exportStar(m, exports) { | ||
| for (var p in m) if (!exports.hasOwnProperty(p)) exports[p] = m[p]; | ||
| for (var p in m) if (!exports.hasOwnProperty(p)) __createBinding(exports, m, p); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
exports.hasOwnProperty(p) won’t work in case exports has a null prototype or has overridden hasOwnProperty(…): microsoft/TypeScript#37013 and #92.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably get in the habit of saving off intrinsics like this (i.e. var hasOwn = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty and hasOwn.call(exports, p)), but we don't necessarily want to have to introduce a __hasOwn helper for that kind of case.
That said, its up to @weswigham if he wants to take on that change for tslib right now, since it's out of scope for this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That said, we do call Object.hasOwnProperty.call in __importStar below this.
Mmmm yes and no - the helper TS emits without |
We could always change that to the way that we define |
|
#99 now includes this, plus feedback~ |
This is the
tslibPR for microsoft/TypeScript#35967