Update Keeps reporting Google Chrome Needs Updating

[mrcsdf]

Brief description of your issue

Each time I run upgrade only one package comes up as needing an update Google Chrome

Steps to reproduce

winget upgrade # List all packages needing upgrade
Name Id Version Available Source

Google Chrome Google.Chrome 87.0.4280.141 latest winget

winget upgrade Google.Chrome
Found Google Chrome [Google.Chrome]
This application is licensed to you by its owner.
Microsoft is not responsible for, nor does it grant any licenses to, third-party packages.
Downloading https://dl.google.com/edgedl/chrome/install/GoogleChromeStandaloneEnterprise64.msi
██████████████████████████████ 68.9 MB / 68.9 MB
Successfully verified installer hash
Starting package install...
Successfully installed

winget upgrade
Name Id Version Available Source

Google Chrome Google.Chrome 87.0.4280.141 latest winget

Expected behavior

Upgrade Chrome does not come up in list of upgradeable apps. I also suspect other apps need upgrade just not coming up as part of the report.

Actual behavior

Google Chrome upgrades and still shows up

Chrome upgrades and then shows up available for upgrade subsequently

Environment

❯ winget --info
Windows Package Manager v0.2.3162 Preview
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Windows: Windows.Desktop v10.0.21286.1000
Package: Microsoft.DesktopAppInstaller v1.11.3162.0

Logs: %LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\Microsoft.DesktopAppInstaller_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalState\DiagOutputDir

Links

Privacy Statement https://aka.ms/winget-privacy
License Agreement https://aka.ms/winget-license
Third Party Notices https://aka.ms/winget-3rdPartyNotice

Any other software?

[jedieaston]

This most likely has something to do with Google Chrome's version being "latest" and not the actual version number. Since winget list reports a real version number, it doesn't have a way to determine whether that version is latest or not.

Maybe instead of latest, whoever updates the manifest should put the real version number and just remove the previous manifest (this is usually wingetbot these days, so I don't know if it can do that by itself or not).

Edit: It already does this for Heroku (see microsoft/winget-pkgs#6003), so it could do the same for Chrome.

[denelon]

We're looking into whether or not we can auto-detect the version from the MSI installer. If we can, we'll see about updating the version. The automation we have will continue to update the manifest as the version changes if that's the case.

[denelon]

The MSI reported version 68.46.141, but when I installed it I got version 87.0.4280.141 from list.

[lychichem]

The MSI reported version 68.46.141, but when I installed it I got version 87.0.4280.141 from list.

Version Number of GoogleChromeEnterprise can be found in 属性-详细信息-备注 like in this picture. For other msi, version number may be at 类别. The only problem is how to extract these strings out.

[denelon]

It appears that the installer version doesn't report what is actually being installed. In this case, the MSI version is below the version that is being reported by Add/Remove programs. This would mean that once you had installed the package, you would not be informed about a newer version being available. I'm expecting that other packages will exhibit the same behavior. The question is whether or not the developer/publisher would be willing to update their installer version or we need another mechanism to correctly capture the version of what is being installed in the manifest somehow.

[walderston]

I have the issue with Chrome were trying to update and I get 'No applicable update found'

[jedieaston]

Can you post the output of winget --info?

[walderston]

Yep @jedieaston

[lychichem]

I have the issue with Chrome were trying to update and I get 'No applicable update found'

This issue is related to the differences between the .exe and .msi versions since the manifests for Google Chrome only includes the .msi version and not both.

It's trying to look for the .exe but fails.

This is also reproducible for Microsoft Edge (Stable, Dev & Beta) & Google Chrome (Beta & Dev).

So, I can find .exe standalone installer for chrome, and will it fix the issue for Google Chrome? And, how to deal with .exe installer and .msi installer? Besides, as far as I know, there are no standalone exe installer for Edge, so the issue will not get fixed for edge.

[lychichem]

So, I can find .exe standalone installer for chrome, and will it fix the issue for Google Chrome?

Yes, it should as long as the installer is from https://www.google.com/chrome because that's where most people download Google Chrome for their personal and testing machines - iirc the enterprise installer is more targeted towards businesses for corporate deployment.

I can upgrade Google Chrome Canary with no issues on WinGet but WinGet fails to update Google Chrome, Google Chrome Beta & Google Chrome Dev because those applications were downloaded using the .exe installer as there are safeguarding measures implemented for Windows Package Manager where it'll prevent updating .msi applications to .exe applications and .exe applications to .msi applications . The only methods are allowed are .msi to .msi and .exe to .exe.

And, how to deal with .exe installer and .msi installer?

You would've to include both of them in the manifest. Just like how it's done for Microsoft Teams over at https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/blob/fe6e4d1b2302b0d5eab221fffc2e93770deec27a/manifests/m/Microsoft/Teams/1.4.00.19572/Microsoft.Teams.installer.yaml#L5-L47.

Besides, as far as I know, there are no standalone exe installer for Edge, so the issue will not get fixed for edge.

There is an offline installer for Edge, but they're all using temporary URLs, so you would have to use the online installer for now which is a method that's used for Google Chrome Canary in WinGet.

Stable - neutral: https://c2rsetup.officeapps.live.com/c2r/downloadEdge.aspx?platform=Default&Channel=Stable&language=en
Beta - neutral: https://c2rsetup.officeapps.live.com/c2r/downloadEdge.aspx?platform=Default&Channel=Beta&language=en
Dev - neutral: https://c2rsetup.officeapps.live.com/c2r/downloadEdge.aspx?platform=Default&Channel=Dev&language=en
Canary - neutral: https://c2rsetup.officeapps.live.com/c2r/downloadEdge.aspx?platform=Default&Channel=Canary&language=en

I mean, as we cannot select installer type (exe or msi) now, is it ok to write both types of installers into one manifest?