Conversation
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation updates across Developer Lightspeed guides standardize heading formats and refine terminology. Changes include modifying section titles from question-based to feature-focused naming conventions and updating product name formatting with non-breaking spaces. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_solution_server.adoc`:
- Line 8: Update the heading in assembly_solution-server-configurations.adoc by
finding the existing heading text "What is the Solution Server" and replacing it
with the new consistent heading "About the Solution Server" so it matches the
con file; ensure only the heading text is changed and the surrounding markup
remains unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 775bf172-3121-4a89-9bdc-0c96829faf57
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
docs/developer-lightspeed-guide/master-docinfo.xmldocs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_agent-ai.adocdocs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_developer-lightspeed-pathways.adocdocs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_intro-to-developer-lightspeed.adocdocs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_solution_server.adoc
| [id="solution-server_{context}"] | ||
|
|
||
| = What is the Solution Server | ||
| = About the Solution Server |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for files still using the old "What is" heading pattern
# Search for "What is the Solution Server" pattern
rg -n "What is the Solution Server" --type=asciidoc
# Also search for similar "What is" patterns in developer-lightspeed files
rg -n "^= What is" docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/ --type=asciidocRepository: migtools/mta-documentation
Length of output: 293
Update heading in assembly file for consistency.
The heading "What is the Solution Server" at line 14 in assembly_solution-server-configurations.adoc should be updated to match the new heading "About the Solution Server" used in the con file.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/topics/developer-lightspeed/con_solution_server.adoc` at line 8, Update
the heading in assembly_solution-server-configurations.adoc by finding the
existing heading text "What is the Solution Server" and replacing it with the
new consistent heading "About the Solution Server" so it matches the con file;
ensure only the heading text is changed and the surrounding markup remains
unchanged.
✅ Confirmed as addressed by @mpershina
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mpershina, understood — the heading has already been updated in main. Thanks for the clarification!
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: Pkylas007
Repo: migtools/mta-documentation PR: 329
File: docs/topics/rules-development/yaml-provider-conditions.adoc:457-457
Timestamp: 2026-03-18T08:59:21.462Z
Learning: In migtools/mta-documentation, do not flag or review cross-reference (xref) anchor ID mismatches or broken xrefs in AsciiDoc (.adoc) files. Maintainers have explicitly requested ignoring xref issues for this repository. Apply this guidance to all .adoc files in the project (pattern: **/*.adoc); do not raise xref-related review comments for these files unless the directive is explicitly lifted.
Learnt from: Pkylas007
Repo: migtools/mta-documentation PR: 326
File: assemblies/ui-guide/assembly_centralized-configurations-analysis.adoc:20-20
Timestamp: 2026-03-30T15:14:19.266Z
Learning: In this repository’s AsciiDoc (.adoc) files, follow Red Hat documentation style for the specific construct: it’s acceptable to use a sentence fragment that starts with “For example, …” as a standalone sentence when it follows a preceding complete statement. Do not flag this as an AsciiDoc grammar or readability issue.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracked under:
Preview: https://mpershina.github.io/Previews/MTA/DL-fixes.html
Summary by CodeRabbit