Skip to content

MTA-6728 Visual Studio Code Plugin guide error fixes#339

Merged
Pkylas007 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mta-6728-vs-code-error-fixes
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

MTA-6728 Visual Studio Code Plugin guide error fixes#339
Pkylas007 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
mta-6728-vs-code-error-fixes

Conversation

@Pkylas007
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 commented Apr 6, 2026

JIRA

Version

  • 8.2.0

Preview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Minor edits across VS Code extension docs to improve clarity and consistency: grammar and wording tweaks, capitalization standardization, punctuation/whitespace fixes, and abstract phrasing adjustments to enhance readability and user guidance.

Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e07a03be-9ee1-473c-b1c7-26fe4b084b70

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 81706b7 and fcfcfcc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Minor documentation edits across VS Code extension docs: capitalization, grammar, whitespace, and small wording tweaks in procedure steps and metadata; no functional changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
VSCode Procedure Files
docs/topics/vscode/proc_configuring-profile-settings.adoc, docs/topics/vscode/proc_installing-analyzer-binary-locally.adoc, docs/topics/vscode/proc_installing-vscode-extension.adoc, docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application-using-profiles.adoc, docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc
Minor text edits: grammar and phrasing adjustments, capitalization standardization ("Marketplace"), removal of extra spacing, and trivial whitespace fixes. No instruction or control-flow changes.
VSCode Guide Metadata
docs/vs-code-extension-guide/master-docinfo.xml
Small wording change in the abstract paragraph (adjusted phrase within descriptive text).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • djzager
  • abrugaro
  • dymurray

Poem

I hopped through files with careful paws,
Fixed caps and spaces, without a cause.
Marketplace gleams, commas in line—
A tidy hop, the docs now shine! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: fixing documentation errors (typos and grammar issues) in Visual Studio Code plugin guides, which aligns with all six file modifications shown in the summary.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch mta-6728-vs-code-error-fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc`:
- Line 6: The sentence contains a duplicated preposition: "to which you want to
migrate the application to"; remove the trailing "to" so the phrase reads
correctly (e.g., "technologies to which you want to migrate the application"),
updating the sentence in
docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d213831b-744f-4a8c-9805-5e5a0dc36c89

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd4dc5a and 81706b7.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_configuring-profile-settings.adoc
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_installing-analyzer-binary-locally.adoc
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_installing-vscode-extension.adoc
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application-using-profiles.adoc
  • docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc
  • docs/vs-code-extension-guide/master-docinfo.xml


[role="_abstract"]
You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies which you want to migrate the application to.
You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application to.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot Apr 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove duplicated preposition in migration-target sentence.

Line 6 currently says “to which you want to migrate the application to,” which is grammatically incorrect due to the extra trailing “to.”

✏️ Proposed fix
-You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application to.
+You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application to.
You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc` at line 6, The
sentence contains a duplicated preposition: "to which you want to migrate the
application to"; remove the trailing "to" so the phrase reads correctly (e.g.,
"technologies to which you want to migrate the application"), updating the
sentence in docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc
accordingly.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Full name first, then it's abbreviation (style guidelines); also, an extra "to" at the rnd

Suggested change
You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application to.
You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The Remote Procedure Call (RPC) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mpershina, you're absolutely right on both counts — thank you for the catch! My original suggestion addressed the duplicate "to" but missed the abbreviation ordering style guideline. Your revised suggestion correctly:

  1. Expands the acronym first: "Remote Procedure Call (RPC)" instead of the reverse.
  2. Drops the trailing "to" — so the sentence ends cleanly with "…to which you want to migrate the application."

The updated line should read:

You can run a static code analysis of an application with or without enabling the Generative AI (GenAI) features. The Remote Procedure Call (RPC) server runs the analysis to detect all issues in the code for one or more target technologies to which you want to migrate the application.

ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ 🐇


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: mpershina
Repo: migtools/mta-documentation PR: 339
File: docs/topics/vscode/proc_vscode-analyzing-application.adoc:6-6
Timestamp: 2026-04-09T08:49:54.549Z
Learning: In migtools/mta-documentation, follow the style guideline that the full name of an acronym/abbreviation must appear first, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses (e.g., "Remote Procedure Call (RPC)" not "RPC (Remote Procedure Call)"). Apply this to all documentation files in the repository.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.


🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: Pkylas007
Repo: migtools/mta-documentation PR: 329
File: docs/topics/rules-development/yaml-provider-conditions.adoc:457-457
Timestamp: 2026-03-18T08:59:21.462Z
Learning: In migtools/mta-documentation, do not flag or review cross-reference (xref) anchor ID mismatches or broken xrefs in AsciiDoc (.adoc) files. Maintainers have explicitly requested ignoring xref issues for this repository. Apply this guidance to all .adoc files in the project (pattern: **/*.adoc); do not raise xref-related review comments for these files unless the directive is explicitly lifted.

Learnt from: Pkylas007
Repo: migtools/mta-documentation PR: 326
File: assemblies/ui-guide/assembly_centralized-configurations-analysis.adoc:20-20
Timestamp: 2026-03-30T15:14:19.266Z
Learning: In this repository’s AsciiDoc (.adoc) files, follow Red Hat documentation style for the specific construct: it’s acceptable to use a sentence fragment that starts with “For example, …” as a standalone sentence when it follows a preceding complete statement. Do not flag this as an AsciiDoc grammar or readability issue.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, done!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 requested a review from anarnold97 April 7, 2026 09:22
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mpershina mpershina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor fix needed, otherwise, LGTM!

Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 merged commit be748a6 into main Apr 9, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants