Conversation
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThree documentation files receive minor editorial updates: removal of an extraneous AsciiDoc list separator in CLI config docs, inline code formatting added for Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/topics/rules-development/yaml-dotnet-provider.adoc (2)
7-7: Keep provider naming consistent between heading and body.The heading uses
Csharpwhile the body consistently uses`csharp`. Consider aligning the heading to the same canonical form to avoid drift in terminology.Also applies to: 10-10
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/topics/rules-development/yaml-dotnet-provider.adoc` at line 7, The document heading "Csharp provider" is inconsistent with the body which uses `csharp`; update the heading text to match the canonical form used in the body (change "Csharp" to "csharp") and scan for the other occurrence noted (line range 10-10) to apply the same change so both headings use the same "csharp" naming.
12-12: Expand acronym on first mention (gRPC).Please introduce the expanded term before the abbreviation on first use (for example,
... uses <full term> (gRPC) ...) to match repo documentation style.Based on learnings: In the documentation, when introducing an acronym/abbreviation, write the full expanded name first and then the abbreviation in parentheses.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/topics/rules-development/yaml-dotnet-provider.adoc` at line 12, Update the sentence in the docs where the "csharp" provider is described so the acronym is expanded on first use: replace the bare "gRPC" with the full term followed by the abbreviation (e.g., "Google Remote Procedure Call (gRPC)") in the sentence that begins "The `csharp` provider uses a gRPC interface..."; ensure the rest of the sentence (mentions of `source-only`, tree-sitter, and stack graph) remains unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/topics/rules-development/yaml-dotnet-provider.adoc`:
- Line 7: The document heading "Csharp provider" is inconsistent with the body
which uses `csharp`; update the heading text to match the canonical form used in
the body (change "Csharp" to "csharp") and scan for the other occurrence noted
(line range 10-10) to apply the same change so both headings use the same
"csharp" naming.
- Line 12: Update the sentence in the docs where the "csharp" provider is
described so the acronym is expanded on first use: replace the bare "gRPC" with
the full term followed by the abbreviation (e.g., "Google Remote Procedure Call
(gRPC)") in the sentence that begins "The `csharp` provider uses a gRPC
interface..."; ensure the rest of the sentence (mentions of `source-only`,
tree-sitter, and stack graph) remains unchanged.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 977b07a1-1a67-4818-88ef-c09011a6b1d9
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_mta-cli-config-flags.adocdocs/topics/release-notes-topics/ref_fixed-issues-8-0-1.adocdocs/topics/rules-development/yaml-dotnet-provider.adoc
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/topics/mta-cli/ref_mta-cli-config-flags.adoc
|
Looking for a uniform way of handling gRPC expansion in Red Hat docs: It cannot be Google Remote Procedure Call because it's not owned by Google these days. |
mpershina
left a comment
mpershina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A small change is needed. Otherwise, LGTM!
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
2 participants
JIRA
Version
Previews
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit