-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
[MRG] Kit2fiff GUI: Test event settings #3463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
dc35d09 to
f5a4f65
Compare
8595359 to
e0ecfcb
Compare
Current coverage is 87.27% (diff: 60.83%)@@ master #3463 diff @@
==========================================
Files 341 341
Lines 60372 60452 +80
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 9229 9246 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 52705 52760 +55
- Misses 4915 4934 +19
- Partials 2752 2758 +6
|
b4978cb to
4fa4cf0
Compare
a6f4ec2 to
c006240
Compare
|
Two errors that seem opaque to me since they don't seem to be relate to the changes. Do these look familiar to anyone? and |
|
Yes the first is a recurring problem (not ours, pyface) and so is the
second (not ours, mayavi)
|
|
In that case this is ready. The changes in non-GUI code are minimal, restricted to factoring out some functionality now required in the GUI. |
|
LGTM +1 for merge but you need a rebase |
c006240 to
01c3c9e
Compare
|
Rebased. The Travis error is |
|
I get that error locally, too, sometimes. It's an unrelated |
|
Any KIT users out there who could test this? @teonbrooks is that just you? |
|
@kingjr, free to test it? |
|
Not really Le 23 août 2016 22:55, "Teon L Brooks" notifications@github.com a écrit :
|
01c3c9e to
ee54355
Compare
|
I've tested it with multiple people's data by now if that helps... |
|
Looks like Travis bombed with the VTK segfault of death. I'll restart and see if it works at least intermittently. |
|
It bombed again, I restarted it again. But really if it fails this often we need to fix it -- can't have the CIs fail that often. Did you add something in this PR that would cause it to render differently? VTK on Travis (and Ubuntu in general) is buggy, so we have to find a way to make it work. |
|
I don’t think there is anything in that PR that should cause it to fail more… What is the failure rate on other PRs?
|
|
Near zero failures
|
|
Is there a way to run it on the intermediate commits to see whether it starts failing at a specific point?
|
|
You can re-push them one by one (like via force-push for the first one) or enable Travis-CI on your own repository and push to some other branch there |
371b2db to
e2593d5
Compare
|
travis and appveyor are happy +1 for merge |
|
Sorry, don't merge, I'm in the process of repushing individual commits to see whether the VTK error starts happening consistently at a specific point |
`stim_chs_ok` already reflects `sqd_file`. If `can_save` also depends on `sqd_file`, `sqd_file` triggers `_get_can_save` before `stim_chs_ok` is updated.
27cdbc1 to
335784f
Compare
Showing progress bar during model test broke travis test
335784f to
12623b7
Compare
|
@Eric89GXL I've identified the problem, the Travis error occurred whenever the test of Kit2FiffModel opened a Progress Dialog. I've added a flag to the model to only show GUI elements when run from the actual GUI, not when run on its own. |
|
Great, thanks for taking the time to figure that out! |
Some enhancements to the KIT2FIFF GUI:
raw.plot()). On my setup this works nicely with the traits gui.