Skip to content

Conversation

@larsoner
Copy link
Member

@larsoner larsoner commented Dec 5, 2019

Redo of #7118 which was closed due to a bad push.

@agramfort
Copy link
Member

the question is should we allow this @larsoner ?
we may be back to situations where people fill the chs loc and dig loc with uncontrolled values.

@larsoner
Copy link
Member Author

larsoner commented Dec 5, 2019

we may be back to situations where people fill the chs loc and dig loc with uncontrolled values.

The question is, do we want people to be able to set these if they don't have fiducials? In master the answer is "no". In this PR, the answer is "yes, with a warning". This seems okay to me. Maybe if we make the warning stronger somehow? For example say that using fsaverage-trans.fif and/or doing inverse imaging is not recommended?

* testing reading old data

* failed as expected, fixing

* added to changelog

* added my name

* deleted reference to private function in docs

* more latest changes, probably wrong but I don't know how to reference a private function

* small doc changes
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #7122 into maint/0.19 will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           maint/0.19    #7122      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       89.67%   89.66%   -0.01%     
==============================================
  Files             422      422              
  Lines           76762    76777      +15     
  Branches        12556    12560       +4     
==============================================
+ Hits            68834    68841       +7     
- Misses           5115     5122       +7     
- Partials         2813     2814       +1

@agramfort agramfort merged commit 22dfbb5 into mne-tools:maint/0.19 Dec 5, 2019
@agramfort
Copy link
Member

thx @larsoner

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants