integration/*: make e2e run without failure#36594
Conversation
thaJeztah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not fully reviewed the changes, but just some quick things I noticed 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you group this with other imports?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you group this with other imports?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bit confused by this one; this forces the directory to be at the root?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah that's how the e2e image is set-up.. I could change that though 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I think it should be flexible, and not rely on a fixed path (ideally), perhaps either an env-var, or relative to where the script is run from?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not a blocker for now (this is only used for the e2e tests)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you group this with other imports?
f283e9d to
68c5f36
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #36594 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 34.85% 34.81% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 612 612
Lines 45445 45720 +275
==========================================
+ Hits 15838 15917 +79
- Misses 27537 27700 +163
- Partials 2070 2103 +33 |
… mainly by skipping if daemon is remote. Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
68c5f36 to
6016e79
Compare
|
odd one on experimental https://jenkins.dockerproject.org/job/Docker-PRs-experimental/39863/console |
|
In the Docker for Desktop CI, we have the same issue as @thaJeztah mentioned. This error appeared just after merging 18.04-ce-dev (84547b2). We saw it already 5 times on different machines, different OSX version. |
… mainly by skipping if daemon is remote.
🦁
Next is the integration-cli runs: currently it's
1017 passed, 570 skipped, 38 FAILED.cc @chris-crone
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester vincent@sbr.pm