chore: add SEP-2207 requirement-traceability YAML (OIDC refresh tokens)#294
Merged
Conversation
commit: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the SEP-2484 requirement-traceability file for SEP-2207: OIDC-flavored refresh token guidance, mapping each normative sentence from the new
## Refresh Tokenssection ofauthorization.mdxto a check ID or an exclusion reason.Requirements
check:rows (2)sep-2207-client-metadata-grant-types— Clients SHOULD includerefresh_tokeningrant_typesclient metadata. Already implemented insrc/scenarios/client/auth/offline-access.ts(from feat (auth): add sep-2207 client checks #166); the YAML check ID matches.sep-2207-server-no-offline-access— Servers SHOULD NOT includeoffline_accessinWWW-Authenticatescope or PRMscopes_supported. Not yet implemented — the server suite has no PRM/WWW-Authenticate scenario, so this needs a new server-side scenario (follow-up).excluded:rows (2)Skipped: the "Clients MAY add
offline_accessto scope" sentence is MAY-level, so it gets no traceability row (the scenario's INFO-leveloffline-access-requestedcheck stays as-is).Severity classification follows the spec text per
AGENTS.md.