Update documentation structure and content#302
Conversation
- Restructure main README to focus on registry purpose and quick start - Streamline docs/README.md with better organization - Update FAQ with current publishing methods and security approach - Simplify roadmap to focus on go-live blockers - Add ecosystem diagram
|
Fixes #150 |
|
@claude please review |
|
Claude finished @domdomegg's task —— View job PR Review for Documentation UpdatesI've completed my review of the documentation structure and content updates in this PR. Overall, this is an excellent restructuring that significantly improves the documentation's clarity and user experience. Detailed Review FindingsTodo List
🟢 Strengths - Excellent work!1. Main README.md restructuring
2. docs/README.md streamlining
3. docs/faq.md improvements
4. docs/roadmap.md focus
5. Ecosystem diagram addition
🟡 Minor suggestions for improvement
📊 Impact AssessmentThis restructuring successfully achieves:
The changes maintain backward compatibility with existing links and improve the overall developer experience significantly. Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE - This PR significantly improves the documentation structure and content quality. The changes are well-thought-out and enhance the user experience without introducing any issues. The restructuring successfully transforms the documentation from a comprehensive reference into a user-friendly guide that balances high-level concepts with practical implementation details. Great work on this improvement! |
| ### Can I extend the registry API? | ||
|
|
||
| The registry tracks GitHub repository IDs (not just URLs) to detect transfers. Daily checks update metadata if repositories move. | ||
| Yes, we support `x-com.example` style extensions in a bunch of places - see the official MCP registry API spec. This can be used to add annotations to many objects, e.g. add security scanning details, enrich package metadata, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we reword this and say that we'll be keeping the extensions that are solely under the "x-publisher" property upon publishing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that should probably go above, will add a FAQ on that. This is in the 'Can I run my own registry instance?' area, where people can add more extensions.
Summary