Skip to content

Conversation

@PTaeuberDS
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #2068

@PTaeuberDS PTaeuberDS self-assigned this Oct 17, 2025
@chrbertsch
Copy link
Collaborator

Pierre: we should perhaps make this more explicit and not put the information when some functions can be called.

Patrick: it is explained better in my other pull request: https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard/pull/2050/files.
I propose to merge this PR.

Pierre: I suggest to have the explanations regarding the "calculated parameter" to this PR or a new PR instead of #2050

Klaus: "... it is optional ..." is confusing

Patrick: I will rewrite it ... But we should wait with merging until #2050 is merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Contradicting statements about the optionality of the intervalDecimal attribute

2 participants