-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
fix lora fetch #67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
fix lora fetch #67
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -129,10 +129,18 @@ def has_lora(self, adapter_name: str) -> bool: | |
| return len([_lora for _lora in self.loras if _lora.tenant_adapter_name == adapter_name]) > 0 | ||
|
|
||
| def find_lora_by_tenant(self, tenant_adapter_name): | ||
| return [_lora for _lora in self.loras if _lora.tenant_adapter_name == tenant_adapter_name][0] | ||
| _loras = [_lora for _lora in self.loras if _lora.tenant_adapter_name == tenant_adapter_name] | ||
| if len(_loras) > 0: | ||
| return _loras[0] | ||
| else: | ||
| raise ValueError(f'No lora found for tenant {tenant_adapter_name}') | ||
|
|
||
| def find_lora(self, adapter_name): | ||
| return [_lora for _lora in self.loras if _lora.adapter_name == adapter_name][0] | ||
| _loras = [_lora for _lora in self.loras if _lora.adapter_name == adapter_name] | ||
| if len(_loras) > 0: | ||
| return _loras[0] | ||
| else: | ||
| raise ValueError(f'No lora found for real adapter_name {adapter_name}') | ||
|
Comment on lines
+139
to
+143
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Similar to my previous comment, this implementation can be made more efficient. Iterating to find the first match is preferable to building a list of all matches, especially since only the first element is used. for _lora in self.loras:
if _lora.adapter_name == adapter_name:
return _lora
raise ValueError(f'No lora found for real adapter_name {adapter_name}') |
||
|
|
||
| @staticmethod | ||
| def match_target_modules( | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this correctly fixes the potential
IndexError, it can be made more efficient. Instead of creating a new list of all matchinglorasjust to get the first one, you can iterate throughself.lorasand return the first match found. This avoids creating an intermediate list and stops iteration as soon as a match is found.