Formalize cllama ingress surfaces and centralize runner protocol mapping#136
Merged
Formalize cllama ingress surfaces and centralize runner protocol mapping#136
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
internal/cllamacllama/googleduring cllama config compilationWhy
Issue #134 identified that provider identity and runner transport had drifted together in OpenClaw's local config logic. This PR makes the runner-to-cllama protocol an explicit infrastructure-owned contract instead of a driver-local convention.
Scope confirmation: only OpenClaw needed an immediate integration change after the contract was centralized. The other in-tree drivers do not currently compile provider identity into runner-specific API-surface enums; they only rewrite base URLs, API keys, or generic custom-provider fields when cllama is enabled.
Testing
go test ./...go vet ./...Closes #134