[website] Update backlink sponsors

[rluzists1]

• I have followed (at least) the PR section of the contributing guide.

Move Megafamous and Goread.io to backlink sponsors section at:

• README.md
• backers.md
• GoldSponsors.tsx

---

Ticket links:
Megafamous 👉 https://groups.google.com/a/mui.com/g/core/c/47JK-xYXXHE
Goread.io 👉 https://groups.google.com/a/mui.com/g/core/c/XdPVfCmFbEs
Preview:

• https://deploy-preview-43995--material-ui.netlify.app/#sponsors
• https://deploy-preview-43995--material-ui.netlify.app/material-ui/discover-more/backers/#gold-sponsors
• https://github.com/rluzists1/material-ui/tree/change-backlink-gold-sponsors?tab=readme-ov-file#gold-

[mui-bot]

Netlify deploy preview

• docs/data/material/discover-more/backers/backers.md

Bundle size report

No bundle size changes (Toolpad)
No bundle size changes

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 6c770eb

[oliviertassinari]

for why https://blend.travel/blog/why-we-dont-always-tag-referrer-traffic-and-when-you-should/

[oliviertassinari]

I have tried to polish the existing sponsors and pushed those changes to HEAD directly.

---

I was wondering about the experience:

Sponsors page

Current:

A:

B:

README

Current:

A:

B:

"current" seems best. What could be ideal is maybe option A but with a bit larger logos. Something that feels less noticeable than in "current", but still bigger than in option A. I don't know. It doubt it will make much of a difference anyway, we can ignore this 👍

[zanivan]

Design-wise, it looks good :)

---

"current" seems best. What could be ideal is maybe option A but with a bit larger logos. Something that feels less noticeable than in "current", but still bigger than in option A. I don't know. It doubt it will make much of a difference anyway, we can ignore this 👍

I agree that the 'current' version looks better on the sponsors page in the docs, but it could be improved in the README. If I had to choose between A and B, I’d likely go with B, because showing only the smaller logos can feel like a different level of sponsorship, not a gold sponsor. That said, I wouldn’t change anything now, as I agree it won't make much of a difference either.

[rluzists1]

nice, thanks both for the input @zanivan @oliviertassinari - I'm going to wait a couple more days to see if these sponsors reply to my message about the updates with any pushback, otherwise, will merge Wednesday morning 👍

[oliviertassinari]

@zanivan the problem I see with option B is that those links, standalone, draw too much attention, it feels like logos blend more into the rest of the page. Maybe if they were links with a lower font-weight, it would work great. On the opposite side with logos, we don't want people to feel like this: https://x.com/mitomenace/status/1789759204510622071

[oliviertassinari]

Great, this is clean 👍