Conversation
Replaces a risky `unwrap()` call on `event.note` in `process_note_events` with a `match` statement. This ensures that if the API returns an event without a note (despite pre-filtering), the application logs an error and continues gracefully instead of panicking. Verified with a regression test case `test_poll_repository_processes_mentions_safely` which mocked the API and ensured the polling loop completes successfully. Existing polling tests also pass. Co-authored-by: myaple <10523487+myaple@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Applied `cargo fmt` to `src/polling.rs` after previous refactoring. Verified with `cargo test polling`. Co-authored-by: myaple <10523487+myaple@users.noreply.github.com>
myaple
deleted the
refactor-polling-safety-unwrap-4291548975554083862
branch
1 participant
Replaced
event.note.unwrap()with amatchstatement insrc/polling.rsto handle potentialNonevalues gracefully by logging an error and returning early, preventing runtime panics. Verified with regression tests.PR created automatically by Jules for task 4291548975554083862 started by @myaple