⚡ Optimize file content extraction performance#96
Conversation
Co-authored-by: myaple <10523487+myaple@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: myaple <10523487+myaple@users.noreply.github.com>
💡 What: Optimized
extract_relevant_file_sectionsinsrc/repo_context.rsby changing the intermediate lines storage fromVec<String>toVec<&str>, avoiding string allocation for every line in the file. Also hoisted theto_lowercase()call for keywords out of the inner loop to prevent repeated allocations.🎯 Why: The previous implementation allocated a new
Stringfor every line in the file content, which is memory intensive for large files. It also re-allocated lowercased keywords for every line iteration.📊 Measured Improvement:
src/tests/repo_context_perf_test.rs.PR created automatically by Jules for task 4761616264722925510 started by @myaple