Open
Conversation
provides compatibility with `smol::Async` for async use.
Owner
|
I haven't used |
Contributor
Author
|
having another look at this it appears y'all already have interior mutability with i am however not sure how to mitigate this :-/ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
provides compatibility with
smol::Asyncfor polling from async contexts:for convenience
Devicealso really needs to beSync, which it is not automatically due to the internal*mut raw::libevdev, however, i can't see from the evdev docs whether this is reasonable or not?