Add usb_config_index to usb_communication_subdriver_s, default to 0.#2148
Conversation
53f35c3 to
fd6196c
Compare
|
❌ Build nut 2.8.1.1085-master failed (commit 6bb9e34cd5 by @kellybyrd) |
|
For clarification, the Such user-friendly integration can be addressed separately (more so if this bites someone); so far it is great to have separate (potentially-)manageable values with recognized semantic difference :) |
The tactical goal of this change is to change
ret = libusb_get_config_descriptor(device,
(uint8_t)usb_subdriver.hid_rep_index,
&conf_desc);
to
ret = libusb_get_config_descriptor(device,
(uint8_t)usb_subdriver.usb_config_index,
&conf_desc);
Before this change, libusb1.c did libusb_get_config_descriptor()
with a config index equal to the interface number. For composite
devices using an interface index > 0, this is usally the wrong
choice. Concretely, I'm using an Arduino for a DIY UPS project and
these are composite devices with multiple interfaces under the
first (and only) config descriptor.
In the USB descriptor heirarchy, deivce descriptors have config
descriptors which have interface descriptors. Also, nearly all
USB devices have a single configuration (index 0).
In order to do this, I added a new member alongside the existing
hid_rep_idex and hid_desc_index. I chose to do this instead of
using the add_var method because this member is used in places
in very similar ways to how hid_rep_index and hid_desc_index is
used. This new member defaults to 0 which covers the majority of
USB devices. Any future subdriver is able to use this if a device
requires it. For existing subdrives, we'll just use an index of 0.
I also changed some debug logging to print out the config index
where the code was already printing the interface index.
Signed-off-by: Kelly Byrd <kbyrd@memcpy.com>
fd6196c to
e1fc248
Compare
Ahh, gotcha! IMO, it's really only useful to have this one be a config var, if the others are too. So that would be
Cool, I'll leave this PR without that then. Doing the above set of value might let someone handle odd hardware without a code change. I think |
|
✅ Build nut 2.8.1.1087-master completed (commit 1441b45374 by @kellybyrd) |
|
So, that fault for shellcheck was irrelevant (a github connection issue). Otherwise, CI seems mostly satisfied (not all scenarios finished yet, others green). |
|
Thanks! Tested with my USB UPS, still works. Not all zeroes were created equal ;) |
The tactical goal of this change is to change
ret = libusb_get_config_descriptor(device,
(uint8_t)usb_subdriver.hid_rep_index,
&conf_desc);
to
ret = libusb_get_config_descriptor(device,
(uint8_t)usb_subdriver.usb_config_index,
&conf_desc);
Before this change, libusb1.c did libusb_get_config_descriptor() with a config index equal to the interface number. For composite devices using an interface index > 0, this is usally the wrong choice. Concretely, I'm using an Arduino for a DIY UPS project and these are composite devices with multiple interfaces under the first (and only) config descriptor.
In the USB descriptor heirarchy, deivce descriptors have config descriptors which have interface descriptors. Also, nearly all USB devices have a single configuration (index 0).
In order to do this, I added a new member alongside the existing hid_rep_idex and hid_desc_index. I chose to do this instead of using the add_var method because this member is used in places in very similar ways to how hid_rep_index and hid_desc_index is used. This new member defaults to 0 which covers the majority of USB devices. Any future subdriver is able to use this if a device requires it. For existing subdrives, we'll just use an index of 0.
I also changed some debug logging to print out the config index where the code was already printing the interface index.
General points
Described the changes in the PR submission or a separate issue, e.g.
known published or discovered protocols, applicable hardware (expected
compatible and actually tested/developed against), limitations, etc.
There may be multiple commits in the PR, aligned and commented with
a functional change. Notably, coding style changes better belong in a
separate PR, but certainly in a dedicated commit to simplify reviews
of "real" changes in the other commits. Similarly for typo fixes in
comments or text documents.
Frequent "underwater rocks" for driver addition/update PRs
Revised existing driver families and added a sub-driver if applicable
(
nutdrv_qx,usbhid-ups...) or added a brand new driver in the othercase.
Did not extend obsoleted drivers with new hardware support features
(notably
blazerand other single-device family drivers for Qx protocols,except the new
nutdrv_qxwhich should cover them all).For updated existing device drivers, bumped the
DRIVER_VERSIONmacroor its equivalent.
For USB devices (HID or not), revised that the driver uses unique
VID/PID combinations, or raised discussions when this is not the case
(several vendors do use same interface chips for unrelated protocols).
For new USB devices, built and committed the changes for the
scripts/upower/95-upower-hid.hwdbfileProposed NUT data mapping is aligned with existing
docs/nut-names.txtfile. If the device exposes useful data points not listed in the file, the
experimental.*namespace can be used as documented there, and discussionshould be raised on the NUT Developers mailing list to standardize the new
concept.
Updated
data/driver.list.inif applicable (new tested device info)Frequent "underwater rocks" for general C code PRs
structure layout and alignment in memory, endianness (layout of bytes and
bits in memory for multi-byte numeric types), or use of generic
intwherelanguage or libraries dictate the use of
size_t(orssize_tsometimes).Progress and errors are handled with
upsdebugx(),upslogx(),fatalx()and related methods, not with directprintf()orexit().Similarly, NUT helpers are used for error-checked memory allocation and
string operations (except where customized error handling is needed,
such as unlocking device ports, etc.)
Coding style (including whitespace for indentations) follows precedent
in the code of the file, and examples/guide in
docs/developers.txtfile.For newly added files, the
Makefile.amrecipes were updated and themake distchecktarget passes.General documentation updates
Updated
docs/acknowledgements.txt(for vendor-backed device support)Added or updated manual page information in
docs/man/*.txtfilesand corresponding recipe lists in
docs/man/Makefile.amfor new pagesPassed
make spellcheck, updated spell-checking dictionary in thedocs/nut.dictfile if needed (did not remove any words -- themakerule printout in case of changes suggests how to maintain it).
Additional work may be needed after posting this PR
Propose a PR for NUT DDL with detailed device data dumps from tests
against real hardware (the more models, the better).
Address NUT CI farm build failures for the PR: testing on numerous
platforms and toolkits can expose issues not seen on just one system.
the changed codebase.