Added syntactic sugar for route collector

[ragboyjr]

Added simpler methods for syntactic sugar for defining routes.

When defining a lot of routes, this saves a lot of typing overhead.

[nikic]

Any opinions on this? /cc @bwoebi

Seems like a reasonable addition to simplify standalone use.

[bwoebi]

In this case, I'd honestly just use __call() magic. Otherwise the next one comes and wants this method supported or that one and next year a RFC will introduce even another method...

[nikic]

@bwoebi Not a big fan of call magic -- it is prone to hide mistakes, e.g. $r->addRuote('GET', '/foo', 'h') would actually add the route ('ADDRUOTE', 'GET', '/foo'). The methods proposed here (maybe with addition of HEAD) seem to be the only request methods in broad use, at least as far as HTTP is concerned.

[bwoebi]

@nikic doing $r->addRoute("GETT", "/foo", "h") is just as prone to errors. I do not see a significant disadvantage here.

[assertchris]

Could check for method spelling (inside __call), using in_array. Of course all this adds overhead...

[ragboyjr]

Personally, I prefer to not use the __call magic method in order because it's less obvious and a bit messier to type hint/document IMO.

[ragboyjr]

@nikic any chance of getting this merged? Should I add any more methods?

[nikic]

Sorry for the delay. Merged with a head() method and a basic test: 7b15535

[ragboyjr]

@nikic thanks!