Conversation
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
* 🐛 add missing header Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> * 🚨 fix warning Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> * 🚨 fix warning Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> --------- Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
|
Given you already make this, would you like to offer module interfaces for this library officially? |
|
What would make it "official"? |
If users can In another word, if this project offers the module interface file, I think the project offers modules officially. |
|
Thanks for the clarification. I am hesitant here, because currently we lack MSVC support. And before offering an official module, I would need to make sure that the whole test suite runs then, too. So I think it requires some more effort, but I think we're on a good track. |
|
Both MSVC and gcc still struggle with modules. I opened a case for MSVC in April. And there is a case for gcc opened back in 2021. |
exposes TU-local entityon gcc-trunk while compiling the library as a module #4759.Closes #4759.