PATCH jsonld, rdf+xml and n3

[bourgeoa]

No description provided.

[bourgeoa]

Should XML+RDF be spec compliant. rdfA is not ???
This questioned the default in case of new file in mashlib.
Creating a .rdf resource succeed but display a parse error.

[jeff-zucker]

Should XML+RDF be spec compliant. rdfA is not ??? This questioned the default in case of new file in mashlib. Creating a .rdf resource succeed but display a parse error.

Are you talking specifically about the content type of the file being PATCHed? I sincerely hope that in the future RDFa will be patchable but that's a big task and not in the spec (yet) so no, I don't think we can offer to support it now. The simple case of creating a new RDFa file with PATCH could easily work but it does not make sense to me to support it if none of the other operations can work. As for XML+RDF - I am not familiar enough with parsing it to know for sure, but it seems to me that there would be no special issues for PATCH and therefore should be supported.

[jeff-zucker]

^^ By which I mean that we should support sending a text/n3 PATCh to change an xml+rdf document, not that we should support sending an xml+rdf PATCH.

[timea-solid]

I feel out of my depth to review this.

[michielbdejong]

LGTM, ship it! In the long run we should actually also have a test for this in the test suite probably - created solid-contrib/test-suite#148 about that